Talking through your butt can result in unintended consequences

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Alamo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Oct 4, 2010
    8,198
    113
    Texas
    Georgia man sues former boss after butt dial costs him his job



    James Stephens and his wife were at home one night complaining about his boss who overheard because James had pocket dialed him. The next day, James says he was given a choice: resign or be fired. He resigned. Now, he and his wife are suing, claiming that eavesdropping was illegal.

    ...

    A state judge now has to decide whether Coan was acting in his official capacity as a state supervisor and therefore deserves immunity. If the judge rules this was a case of one private person eavesdropping on another, then this case moves forward.

    So once again we need to review the four rules:

    1. Phones are always listening.

    2. Never keep any contacts in your phone for whom you are not willing to share secrets that can destroy your life.

    3. Keep your finger (or your butt) off of the send button until you really sure you want to call/text.

    4. Be sure of the recipient.
     

    Rookie

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Sep 22, 2008
    18,164
    113
    Kokomo
    How is this eavesdropping? Dumb ass called his boss. I don't know about anyone else, but if someone I know calls me, I typically answer the phone.
     

    indykid

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jan 27, 2008
    11,871
    113
    Westfield
    How is this eavesdropping? Dumb ass called his boss. I don't know about anyone else, but if someone I know calls me, I typically answer the phone.

    Agree, but in this day and age where judges make laws and can change the meaning of a constitutional right, sadly anything goes.
     

    Rookie

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Sep 22, 2008
    18,164
    113
    Kokomo
    "Lawyer David Guldenschuh represents the Stephenses. He argues the conversation was private, Coan knew it, and was legally obligated to hang up.

    "You may not use an electronic device to listen into a conversation you know to be a private conversation," Guldenschuh said."

    THE DUMB ASS CALLED HIS BOSS! That's not a private conversation.
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,773
    113
    Mitchell
    I don't know...You might be able to make the case that yeah, he called his boss (by accident). The boss did nothing wrong by answering and maybe hanging on for a bit trying to determine if it was a legit call (we've all gotten those that takes a few seconds to determine if the call was a hang-up, bad connection, butt-dial, etc.). But at some point, it's obvious the call was a mistake and he wasn't the intended recipient of the information.
     

    Spear Dane

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 4, 2015
    5,119
    113
    Kokomo area
    Why do you keep saying "He called his boss!" Actually, no, he didn't. His phone did and without his knowledge. That's why it's called a butt dial. If the law supports it, this guy has a case and should win.

    Eavesdropping is secretly listening to the private conversation of others without their consent, as defined by Black's Law Dictionary. The practice is commonly believed to be unethical.
     

    Mgderf

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    43   0   0
    May 30, 2009
    17,996
    113
    Lafayette
    "Talking out your butt..."
    When I read the title, I had a whole different idea of what this thread might be about.

    It reminded me of something my dad used to tell people round him if he caught them farting.
    He would tell them, "Well, your voice is changing, but your breath smells the same!" :lmfao:
     

    rob63

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    20   0   0
    May 9, 2013
    4,282
    77
    Eavesdropping or not, what kind of douchebag thinks he needs to fire somebody just for complaining to his own wife? I'm guessing the fired guy isn't the only employee talking about what an idiot he is.
     

    Rookie

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Sep 22, 2008
    18,164
    113
    Kokomo
    Why do you keep saying "He called his boss!" Actually, no, he didn't. His phone did and without his knowledge. That's why it's called a butt dial. If the law supports it, this guy has a case and should win.

    Eavesdropping is secretly listening to the private conversation of others without their consent, as defined by Black's Law Dictionary. The practice is commonly believed to be unethical.

    His phone was in his possession. Whether it was intentional or not, he called his boss. My wife has a habit of calling her phone after every call to avoid accidental dialing. To me, it's a matter of accepting responsibility. Intentional or not, he screwed up.
     

    Rookie

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    14   0   0
    Sep 22, 2008
    18,164
    113
    Kokomo
    Eavesdropping or not, what kind of douchebag thinks he needs to fire somebody just for complaining to his own wife? I'm guessing the fired guy isn't the only employee talking about what an idiot he is.

    That's the thing, the dumbass resigned. He should have made his boss fire him.
     

    russc2542

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Oct 24, 2015
    2,119
    83
    Columbus
    Or there is a lot more to this.

    Agreed. If the boss is worth $.02, nothing new was learned. There might be things that could muddy the water (sharing company proprietary info, outlining company business strategy, arranging a hit) but just bellyaching to the wife... then again, a good manager that would be more reasonable probably wouldn't be complained about in the first place. Put differently, talking about something fire-able is different than just complaining about him.
     

    rhino

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    30,906
    113
    Indiana
    There are only 3 rules to phone safety.

    tumblr_nyqxaw28tk1qa9yc1o1_400.gif
     

    amboy49

    Master
    Rating - 83.3%
    5   1   0
    Feb 1, 2013
    2,300
    83
    central indiana
    Why do you keep saying "He called his boss!" Actually, no, he didn't. His phone did and without his knowledge. That's why it's called a butt dial. If the law supports it, this guy has a case and should win.

    Eavesdropping is secretly listening to the private conversation of others without their consent, as defined by Black's Law Dictionary. The practice is commonly believed to be unethical.


    I think, based on your logic, that if “my gun shoots somebody” I am not at fault (?). Have I got that right ?
     

    amboy49

    Master
    Rating - 83.3%
    5   1   0
    Feb 1, 2013
    2,300
    83
    central indiana
    Eavesdropping or not, what kind of douchebag thinks he needs to fire somebody just for complaining to his own wife? I'm guessing the fired guy isn't the only employee talking about what an idiot he is.


    Let’s see - regardless of how this guy’s boss found out, the boss now knows that he has a disgruntled employee who, at best, holds his boss in low esteem. Further, if the guy is willing to talk to his wife about him, he’s probably also capable of talking to fellow employees and undermining his boss’ authority. So, as a boss I guess I have two options. (1) talk with the employee and try to learn about why he is disgruntled or (2) talk to the guy and tell him he is fired. Don’t know if it is an “at will” state like Indiana, but he can fire the employee at his discretion. The employee, given a choice, should not have resigned. At the very least he would have received unemployment compensation. Having resigned I would assume he gets nothing.
     
    Top Bottom