Join INGunOwners For Free
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 31
  1. #21
    Grandmaster ghuns's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by femurphy77 View Post
    Dammit man this is INGO; we don' need no steenking facts!
    Right?

    Pfft, lawyers.
    Necessity is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.

  2. #22
    Expert Hatin Since 87's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by HoughMade View Post
    How do you prosecute an anonymous source and how do you prove PETA new it was a false when they passed it on?
    Arent you a lawyer? You donít need no stinking proof! Just use them fancy words and a little bribery
    I find you offensive for finding me offensive.

    Often imitated, Never duplicated.

  3. #23
    Grandmaster HoughMade's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Alright, alright....I'll back it down to law school theoretical where things like actually gathering the evidence to support the charges is irrelevant.

    If they can determine who made the doctored recording and that they intended to have it reported to law enforcement then that ​may be a crime. Also IF there is evidence that can prove that a specific person at PETA knew that the video was portraying the situation in a false light when they reported it, then that may​ be a crime also.
    Last edited by HoughMade; 3 Weeks Ago at 12:28.
    ​Bullies suck. They also make you stronger.

  4. #24
    Grandmaster Sigblitz's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by 2A_Tom View Post
    I just posted an article here about fur harvesting.
    Pretty nasty.

  5. #25
    Expert Hatin Since 87's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by HoughMade View Post
    Alright, alright....I'll back it down to law school theoretical where things like actually gathering the evidence to support the charges is irrelevant.

    If they can determine who made the doctored recording and that they intended to have it reported to law enforcement then that is a crime. Also IF there is evidence that can prove that a specific person at PETA knew that the video was portraying the situation in a false light when they reported it, then that may​ be a crime also.
    Theres them fancy lawyer words, I feel like the world is right again. Thank you
    I find you offensive for finding me offensive.

    Often imitated, Never duplicated.

  6. #26
    Expert

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by HoughMade View Post
    Seeing as how PETA, and leftists in general, promote policies that would radically lower food production, both animal and plant based, I would say they value animals far above humans.
    back before the hamas coup in gaza, fatah/pal.auth. sent a donkey loaded with explosives to wander over to a border check point. The Israeli soldiers sized up the situation and shot the donkey. newkirk then sent a letter to arafat, sympathizing with his agenda of killing Jews but asked him not to endanger anymore animals.

  7. #27
    Grandmaster phylodog's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Typical liberal horse ****. When they finally get smacked in the face with the reality that none of their beliefs are based on facts they begin to make **** up to fit their imagination. It is a mental disorder based on an acute weakness of the mind.
    There's lots of ________ on here who don't fit your particular stereotype, smearing us with goofball sophistry is what is out of line. It just makes gunowners look like *******s.

    - CarmelHP

  8. #28
    Le mot juste 2A_Tom's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Dick the butcher was right!




  9. #29
    Master AmmoManAaron's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by HoughMade View Post
    How do you prosecute an anonymous source and how do you prove PETA new it was a false when they passed it on?
    I would say that once it was discovered that the video had been doctored and the people making the video were trespassing, law enforcement should have widened the investigation to PETA. Specifically, they should have executed a warrant to review PETA's various communications (email, etc.). This may have revealed that PETA was instrumental in the frame-up operation against the farmer. At a minimum, it may have led to the identification of the "anonymous" video maker(s) who then should have been prosecuted.

    This scum is trying to ruin people's lives. Law enforcement and prosecutors need to take that more seriously and go after the perps.
    "2016: The year that hackers became more trusted than government or reporters."

  10. #30
    Plinker radar8756's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by femurphy77 View Post
    Dammit man this is INGO; we don' need no steenking facts!
    https://youtu.be/VqomZQMZQCQ

    Any day your NOT in JAIL ... is a GOOD Day

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Button Dodge