My question... and a separate one from the IKEA thread. How far are you willing to go to say things need to change when incidents happen? An obviously LEO posted that 80+ NDs resulting in injury or death occur in Marion County alone each year. Yet, an idiot with poor carry choices drops a gun that a kid fired, no one is hurt, and half of you want him prosecuted for lesser laws that don’t exist, but you believe should?????!?!?
Why are half the people reacting as if we need to change current laws, or introduce new ones to punish this guy in this rare circumstance? Are you really OK with more laws anytime an un or under precisented situation arises? What happened to government staying out of our lives? Idiot made a “knucklehead” carry choice. The idiot will be shamed and feel terrible for ever. Others learn from the situation and slowly fix the internal issue with the culture.
Do you really want to set a precedent that more laws or changing current laws are necessary every time an issue arises from some *******, so we can “protect the kids”?
What happened to shall not infringe?
He, we and thousands learned from his mistakes (forgive my hatred for the Oxford comma). No one was hurt. Why meddle in a good thing just to punish an idiot who made a poor decision?
He didn’t recklessly, knowingly, or intentionally performs an act that creates a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person, did he?
Why are half the people reacting as if we need to change current laws, or introduce new ones to punish this guy in this rare circumstance? Are you really OK with more laws anytime an un or under precisented situation arises? What happened to government staying out of our lives? Idiot made a “knucklehead” carry choice. The idiot will be shamed and feel terrible for ever. Others learn from the situation and slowly fix the internal issue with the culture.
Do you really want to set a precedent that more laws or changing current laws are necessary every time an issue arises from some *******, so we can “protect the kids”?
What happened to shall not infringe?
He, we and thousands learned from his mistakes (forgive my hatred for the Oxford comma). No one was hurt. Why meddle in a good thing just to punish an idiot who made a poor decision?
He didn’t recklessly, knowingly, or intentionally performs an act that creates a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person, did he?