Sig brace

[victor 1971]

You can take a Sig SB 15 brace and fold the bottom pieces inward and then wrap the Velcro tight and significantly make that ugly back end smaller and more useful. That's legal, eh? Not a modification? Not crossing that blurry line?

 

[Tombs]

I'd say that entirely depends on the officer who decides to attempt to enforce such a law.

Almost entirely sure it'd be thrown out in court because you didn't modify the device, but a cop may decide he wants to ruin your day over it, so YMMV.

 

[Route 45]

Why don't you email the ATF and ask them? What are you going to tell them if you get jammed up because you've done this and they decide that it's a modification that effectively turns the arm brace into a stock? You gonna tell them, "Well, these guys on INGO said it was probably ok."

Or you could just pay $200 and put any kind of stock that you want on it.

 

[Trigger Time]

It's not a permanent modification. Also last time I checked cops dont enforce federal NFA laws nor would most cops even know what a legal vs illegal gun was.

 

[Tyler-The-Piker]

A person can now shoulder a pistol brace so might as well get the adjustable SB or even the Shockwave...

 

[Spear Dane]

Forget Sig, Shockwave is the thing now. And MUUUUUUUCH cheaper.

 

[Peacekeeper3073]

The Shockwave blade is a good brace. I like it for the size and weight.

 

[victor 1971]

Just seeing what everyone thought, thanks.

 

[Vigilant]

You can take a Sig SB 15 brace and fold the bottom pieces inward and then wrap the Velcro tight and significantly make that ugly back end smaller and more useful. That's legal, eh? Not a modification? Not crossing that blurry line?

Legal until you posted intent on the world wide web. Just as the dumb asses that kept badgering the ATF to "clarify" the shouldering issue, if you continue to modify and post, you will attract unwanted attention.

 

[Vigilant]

It's not a permanent modification. Also last time I checked cops dont enforce federal NFA laws nor would most cops even know what a legal vs illegal gun was.

Unfortunately a bunch side to the illegal, and it's up to you to pay to prove otherwise, just as Point Blank decides to enforce Federal Tax law?

 

[Vigilant]

Why don't you email the ATF and ask them? What are you going to tell them if you get jammed up because you've done this and they decide that it's a modification that effectively turns the arm brace into a stock? You gonna tell them, "Well, these guys on INGO said it was probably ok."

Or you could just pay $200 and put any kind of stock that you want on it.

No, just NO! This is why it was legal until it was illegal, and now it's "legal" again barring intent. Just shut the **** up,and let the ruling be!

 

[Vigilant]

No, just NO! This is why it was legal until it was illegal, and now it's "legal" again barring intent. Just shut the **** up,and let the ruling be!

On second read, I apologize to Route 45,as he said what I said, I just read it differently.

 

[churchmouse]

Easy up people. These idiot rules drive me freaking crazy just like they do every one else. It is all a big pile of happy horse ****.
In light of the fact we are a monitored site I pulled the pic in the last thread just because.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

Easy up people. These idiot rules drive me freaking crazy just like they do every one else. It is all a big pile of happy horse ****.
In light of the fact we are a monitored site I pulled the pic in the last thread just because.

Yeah...

The ATF letters are what they are. Use your best judgement. Let your conscience be your guide and don't go on the internet stating your intention to circumvent federal law or a what you believe might be federal law/policy.

 

[GlockRiver]

Legal until you posted intent on the world wide web. Just as the dumb asses that kept badgering the ATF to "clarify" the shouldering issue, if you continue to modify and post, you will attract unwanted attention.

So true. Zip it guys and just enjoy the darn things.