Did you read this?---

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • bd1024

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Dec 22, 2011
    72
    8
    Indy
    Court: Police can keep guns of man not arrested

    Updated: Tuesday, 06 Aug 2013, 3:41 PM EDT
    Published : Tuesday, 06 Aug 2013, 3:41 PM EDT

    • Charles Wilson, Associated Press
    INDIANAPOLIS (AP) - The Indiana Court of Appeals says police can keep nearly 50 guns they seized from a man found watching a Bloomington bar where an Indiana University student partied the night she went missing more than a year earlier.
    The 2-1 ruling Tuesday upheld a local judge's ruling allowing police to keep guns they confiscated from Robert Redington's Indianapolis home in August 2012. Police found Redington peering through a range finder at the bar Lauren Spierer visited before her June 2011 disappearance. He's not suspected in the disappearance.
    Redington wasn't arrested, but authorities said a state law allows them to seize weapons from dangerous people.
    Redington's lawyer argues the law is unconstitutional and a psychiatrist determined Redington wasn't dangerous.
    Attorney Guy Relford says he will appeal. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So looking through a RANGEFINDER, (not a scope), makes you a dangerous person?----(Lots of criminals around here?)-----What's your thoughts? ----
     
    Last edited:

    HenryWallace

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 7, 2013
    778
    18
    Fort Wayne
    As long as your actions aren't...

    Providing self sufficiency, self reliance, or self preservation.
    Proving facts and truth.
    Providing help to the less fortunate or unable.
    Against the (often wrong) MSM's take and interpretation of events.

    Then you're just fine.. Right?!
     

    bd1024

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Dec 22, 2011
    72
    8
    Indy
    "but authorities said a state law allows them to seize weapons from dangerous people." ---- I wonder how many INGO members would be considered as "dangerous" --- I'd bet a dollar to a donut that he will never see his guns again. ----
     

    bd1024

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Dec 22, 2011
    72
    8
    Indy
    First They Came for the Jews
    by Martin Niemöller

    First they came for the Jews
    and I did not speak out
    because I was not a Jew.

    Then they came for the Communists
    and I did not speak out
    because I was not a Communist.

    Then they came for the trade unionists
    and I did not speak out
    because I was not a trade unionist.

    Then they came for me
    and there was no one left
    to speak out for me.
     

    HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    35,727
    149
    Valparaiso
    First they came for a guy who saw "dark entities" who told him his Jewish neighbor was a molester who needed to be "dropped off" in a corn field.....

    Then they also came for the guy hanging out in a parking garage who told the cops that he had a rifle sighted from there on the entrance they had come through and on the front of a bar below.....

    Then they came for a guy who expressed how easy it would be to kidnap a petite college-aged girl and that she couldn't put up a struggle or make a sound....

    Then they came for the guy who received "spiritual prophecy" and said the reason he didn't actually point a gun was too many cameras....

    Oh, wait...they were all the same guy.

    http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/08061302ebb.pdf

    Yeah....we're all next on the list.
     

    Denny347

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    13,429
    149
    Napganistan
    "but authorities said a state law allows them to seize weapons from dangerous people." ---- I wonder how many INGO members would be considered as "dangerous" --- I'd bet a dollar to a donut that he will never see his guns again. ----

    I am compiling a list...it's getting pretty long. BTW, what was your name again?
     

    rcdouble2

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 27, 2012
    55
    6
    Has anyone seen or know the Indiana "STATE LAW" IC code they are referring to that gives them this authority?
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    525,283
    Messages
    9,812,761
    Members
    53,822
    Latest member
    Spencerab23
    Top Bottom