Page 27 of 34 FirstFirst ... 17 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ... LastLast
Results 261 to 270 of 333

Thread: The Insane "Social Justice" Thread pt IV

  1. #261
    Grandmaster ChristianPatriot's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Just being white in America proves racist intent. Haven’t you guys been paying attention?
    Don't practice until you do it right; practice until you can't do it wrong.

  2. #262
    INGO Homebrewer JettaKnight's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by KLB View Post
    You misread. Impossible to PROVE thus easily abused.

    How are you going to prove someone called 911 based upon prejudice for some protected class? Even the example in the article in NY was more about the guy annoying her than him being black.
    Yeah... if you can't prove that I had some racist intent when I called 911, then how can you abuse this ordinance?


    So how do you abuse a feckless law?
    Quote Originally Posted by Abraham Lincoln
    Do I not destroy my enemies when I make them my friends?
    Quote Originally Posted by printcraft View Post
    You would do well to avoid his "caramelized banana" trap offer.

  3. #263
    Expert Mikey1911's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    “Guilty Upon Accusation” will be how the “CAREN” act functions.

    And another relative of the old USSR crimes “Malicious Hooliganism” and “Anti-Soviet Agitation“ has come to the United States.
    Brother, you asked for it!—Francisco Domingo Carlos Andres Sebastian d’Anconia

  4. #264
    Grandmaster Phase2's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by JettaKnight View Post
    Yeah... if you can't prove that I had some racist intent when I called 911, then how can you abuse this ordinance?

    So how do you abuse a feckless law?
    Haven't been paying attention? The process is the punishment.

    First you accuse someone. In a percentage of cases, that is enough to get SJWs to attack.
    Second, a person is charged for "calling 911 while prejudiced". It then takes thousands to defend yourself.
    Third, there is a good chance that you lose your job and possibly friends/family in the process.

    It costs the accuser nothing. The state does all the work to destroy someone's life and the accused can suffer catastrophic harm. This is not justice.
    Dems (Politicians/MSM/Tech/etc): Replace Free Speech With Curated Information

  5. #265
    KLB
    KLB is offline
    Grandmaster KLB's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by JettaKnight View Post
    Yeah... if you can't prove that I had some racist intent when I called 911, then how can you abuse this ordinance?


    So how do you abuse a feckless law?
    Well, this is to allows civil lawsuits not assign criminal charges. It is not hard to see how a lot of lawsuits could be generated by something like that. The one suing won't have repercussions if they lose, since lawyers usually take a cut of the winnings and lawyer costs would have to be paid by the defendant if they lose. The defendant will have to pay to defend themself though, plus be in jeopardy of more financial loss if they lose. Civil suits are not beyond a reasonable doubt either, so there could be a lot of losers that aren't actually guilty.
    They shouldn't just drop a hellfire missile on your café experience...Rand Paul

  6. #266
    Cogito, ergo porto.
    Bill of Rights's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by JettaKnight View Post
    Yeah... if you can't prove that I had some racist intent when I called 911, then how can you abuse this ordinance?


    So how do you abuse a feckless law?
    If something is feckless, by definition, it is without feck,

    Therefore: Feck it.







    Thanks for your help in keeping this a great forum!
    Forum Rules#######Classifieds Rules##############?!?! wait...what?

  7. #267
    Grandmaster DoggyDaddy's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill of Rights View Post
    If something is feckless, by definition, it is without feck,

    Therefore: Feck it.






    So you're saying we should give a feck?

    ETA: I just got the image of one of those little dishes of change by a convenience store register that used to say, "Need a penny? Take a penny. Have a penny? Leave a penny."

    Need a feck? Take a feck. Have a feck? Give a feck.

  8. #268
    Grandmaster jamil's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    I don’t have any fecks to give.
    I have spoken.
    If you’re woke you dig it.
    **** Biden!

  9. #269
    Grandmaster DoggyDaddy's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by DoggyDaddy View Post
    So you're saying we should give a feck?

    ETA: I just got the image of one of those little dishes of change by a convenience store register that used to say, "Need a penny? Take a penny. Have a penny? Leave a penny."

    Need a feck? Take a feck. Have a feck? Give a feck.
    Quote Originally Posted by jamil View Post
    I don’t have any fecks to give.
    I edited my post. You can take a feck.

  10. #270
    Grandmaster jamil's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by jamil View Post
    I don’t have any fecks to give.
    I’m a proud man. I don’t accept charity fecks.
    I have spoken.
    If you’re woke you dig it.
    **** Biden!

Page 27 of 34 FirstFirst ... 17 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •