Oh my. Intel & FBI had report that Hillary approved Russian Collusion campaign

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Alamo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Oct 4, 2010
    8,224
    113
    Texas
    ... in July 2016. The intel community, the FBI knew, and I find it hard to believe that Mueller's team did not know. Somehow this was never mentioned or leaked, unlike a certain dossier that was disinformatzia on its face.

    https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/09/29/bombshell-hillary-clinton-may-have-signed-off-on-plan-to-sink-trump-with-russia-hoax-n985890


    [FONT=&amp]On Tuesday, Director of National Intelligence John Ratcliffe briefed Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on documents revealing an alleged Hillary Clinton plot to launch a scandal campaign attempting to tie then-candidate Donald Trump to Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Russians’ hacking of the Democratic National Committee. The Intelligence Community had discovered a Russian analysis about the plot and even briefed President Barack Obama about it. CIA Director John Brennan forwarded a referral to FBI Director James Comey and a certain deputy assistant director of counterintelligence named Peter Strzok.
    [/FONT]
    [FONT=&amp]Graham said the newly uncovered documents may suggest a double standard at the FBI.[/FONT]
    [FONT=&amp]“This latest information provided by DNI Ratcliffe shows there may have been a double standard by the FBI regarding allegations against the Clinton campaign and Russia,” Graham said in a statement. “Whether these allegations are accurate is not the question. The question is did the FBI investigate the allegations against Clinton like they did Trump? If not, why not? If so, what was the scope of the investigation? If none, why was that?”[/FONT]

    ...there may have been a double standard. Ya think?

    Letter that DNI Ratliffe sent to Senator Graham, dated today, 29 Sep 20: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/im...ne Investigations_20-00912_U_SIGNED-FINAL.pdf
     

    Alamo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Oct 4, 2010
    8,224
    113
    Texas
    While this particular piece of Intel has yet to be (publicly) verified and might be total crap or just Russian disinformation, it is true that every half witted accusation against Trump was leaked by government officials and publicly paraded by the democratic party propaganda organs known as the main stream media as if they were gospel. Yet not a word This report on Hillary’s possible involvement was ever even hinted that until Barr and Durham Started dredging the mock. Every detail on the shabbiness Of the “investigation” of Trump and his campaign has had to be dragged kicking and screaming out of the shadows..
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Interesting. A private citizen tried to conjure up a story about another candidate having ties to another nation. Sounds unethical. How exactly is it illegal, and what are the feds supposed to do about candidates telling lies? Unless there is a claim that the candidate was working with a foreign nation, or with the assistance of the federal govt, which isn’t stated in the post, how does this rise above a private citizen spreading lies to help their campaign?

    Clinton left govt work in 2013.
     

    Ingomike

    Top Hand
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    May 26, 2018
    28,783
    113
    North Central
    While this particular piece of Intel has yet to be (publicly) verified and might be total crap or just Russian disinformation, it is true that every half witted accusation against Trump was leaked by government officials and publicly paraded by the democratic party propaganda organs known as the main stream media as if they were gospel. Yet not a word This report on Hillary’s possible involvement was ever even hinted that until Barr and Durham Started dredging the mock. Every detail on the shabbiness Of the “investigation” of Trump and his campaign has had to be dragged kicking and screaming out of the shadows..

    BUT, the deep state is doing everything in its power to stop any release of information, kicking and screaming (redactions and slow walking) to keep this from getting out before the election. That when Trump loses it will be forever buried is the goal...

    Much of this stuff coming out I read about years ago on Gateway Pundit, that was called an unreliable site trafficking in rumor and leaks, unlike the NYT.

    When the left and their ilk are in trouble this seems to be the pattern they follow.

    That Joe robbed a bank is leaked.

    MSM, You have no proof of that, just a leak.

    More is learned but not definitive proof.

    MSM, It is still just a leak.

    Then years later the proof begins to come out.

    MSM, Nothing burger, they been accusing Joe of that for years without proof.

    MSM, Let's just move along...
     

    ATM

    will argue for sammiches.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    30   0   0
    Jul 29, 2008
    21,019
    83
    Crawfordsville
    we have been saying this for four years. and were called conspiracy theorists

    2o1xc5.jpg
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    31,921
    77
    Camby area
    Interesting. A private citizen tried to conjure up a story about another candidate having ties to another nation. Sounds unethical. How exactly is it illegal, and what are the feds supposed to do about candidates telling lies? Unless there is a claim that the candidate was working with a foreign nation, or with the assistance of the federal govt, which isn’t stated in the post, how does this rise above a private citizen spreading lies to help their campaign?

    Clinton left govt work in 2013.

    Speaking of, lets also look at the Clinton Foundation. Which "coincidentally" stopped receiving substantial donations shortly after Nov 8 2016. Gee, I wonder why? :scratch: Maybe somebody should look into that too. Did all the starving children they were to feed and house suddenly not need the charity an more?

    While we are at it, lets ask the Hatians how well they were helped by the foundation considering the monies pledged to the rebuild. What was it? Pennies on the dollar actually made it in-country? Millions raised and 2 or 3 actual houses built?
     

    TangoFoxtrot

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 22, 2018
    1,352
    83
    United states
    ... in July 2016. The intel community, the FBI knew, and I find it hard to believe that Mueller's team did not know. Somehow this was never mentioned or leaked, unlike a certain dossier that was disinformatzia on its face.

    https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/tyler-o-neil/2020/09/29/bombshell-hillary-clinton-may-have-signed-off-on-plan-to-sink-trump-with-russia-hoax-n985890




    ...there may have been a double standard. Ya think?

    Letter that DNI Ratliffe sent to Senator Graham, dated today, 29 Sep 20: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/im...ne Investigations_20-00912_U_SIGNED-FINAL.pdf
    This is old news, the problem is getting someone to act on it. The whole reason this Russian collision and intentional corona out break were initiated was to slow trumps team down from trying to hold the treasonous criminals accountable. They were hoping to hold things off long enough to get trump out of office.. if he gets another 4 years (I'm voting trump) he will unleash everything because he doesn't have reelection to worry about

    Sent from my SM-N975U using Tapatalk
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    60,556
    113
    Gtown-ish
    Interesting. A private citizen tried to conjure up a story about another candidate having ties to another nation. Sounds unethical. How exactly is it illegal, and what are the feds supposed to do about candidates telling lies? Unless there is a claim that the candidate was working with a foreign nation, or with the assistance of the federal govt, which isn’t stated in the post, how does this rise above a private citizen spreading lies to help their campaign?

    Clinton left govt work in 2013.

    Oh, Idunno. Maybe not participate in those lies.
     
    Top Bottom