A DHS question

[TheRude1]

Anyone know anything about this ?
Spoof or one of those things we find out in a year was true ???
Took a look and found no Dupes so if it is, Ooopps

Feds Say Possession of ?Large Amounts? of Weapons May Indicate Terrorist Activity | Public Intelligence

 

[TheRude1]

And

» Do you have too many guns or too much ammunition? The Federal government wants to know

 

[threedhuntr]

Anyone know anything about this ?
Spoof or one of those things we find out in a year was true ???
Took a look and found no Dupes so if it is, Ooopps

Feds Say Possession of ?Large Amounts? of Weapons May Indicate Terrorist Activity | Public Intelligence

If that pic is their idea of a large amount of weapons and ammo them I'm .... ....... well

 

[onetwoonetwo]

boy it's a good thing i got rid of everything except 1 handgun and a couple of boxes of bullets!

 

[hookedonjeep]

"The illegal possession of large amounts of ammunition is also listed as a potential indicator of criminal weapons possession related to terrorism.”

Since when is possession of large amounts of ammo illegal? Talk about subjective.....

Also, it is wording like this that confuses the sheeple into believing whatever the .gov wants them to. If enough of them read this, and pass that little gem of false knowledge on to 10 of their friends, and so on and so forth.... This is why we fight an uphill battle with the sheeple.

 

[Whitsettd8]

If it wasn't for that INGO boating accident we would all be in trouble.

 

[Maximinus Thrax]

I liked the comment below the article...

Is the weapons cache below the table?

 

[zippy23]

just another way to slowly creep into taking more freedoms away. soon they will put limits on amounts you can have. Its not long before an outright ban happens. Hopefully we stop it, but i doubt it, seeing the way things are going.

 

[eldirector]

If acquiring large amounts of ammunition is a sign of "terrorist activity", then the DHS is the biggest fish in that pond.

 

[halfmileharry]

If acquiring large amounts of ammunition is a sign of "terrorist activity", then the DHS is the biggest fish in that pond.

...and wanting to keep it that way. Stack the odds in your favor is always a strategic key.

 

[Mgderf]

Just more "chicken-little" talk from our "Cheerless Fearleader".

Nothing new to see here, move along.

 

[snorko]

If that pic is their idea of a large amount of weapons and ammo them I'm .... ....... well

I have more than that for sale on INGO right now

 

[indiucky]

I have more than that for sale on INGO right now

And we may be needing to talk about a certain cz 452 varmint.........

 

[Destro]

I mean, it's kinda true. I don't think gang bangers share 1 10/22 for the whole gang

 

[hooky]

I mean, it's kinda true. I don't think gang bangers share 1 10/22 for the whole gang

So I should be limited to what I can possess based on the proclivities of gang bangers?

 

[indyjack]

"The illegal possession of large amounts of ammunition is also listed as a potential indicator of criminal weapons possession related to terrorism.”

then shouldn't the DHS be on the terrorist watch list?

 

[cook4army]

just another way to slowly creep into taking more freedoms away. soon they will put limits on amounts you can have. Its not long before an outright ban happens. Hopefully we stop it, but i doubt it, seeing the way things are going.

I'm thinking back to a particular statement made by a guest on Piers Morgans show right after Newtown. I don't remember his name, but essentially he stated that "if they try to take away our guns, it will be 1776 all over again!!!"

Not saying it will or should go to that point, but very well may end up there if it does happen.

 

[Destro]

So I should be limited to what I can possess based on the proclivities of gang bangers?

where does the bulletin say anything like that? did you read it?

 

[hooky]

where does the bulletin say anything like that? did you read it?

You seemed to be suggesting that it was reasonable, given the fact that gang bangers don't share a single 10/22.

 

[Destro]

You seemed to be suggesting that it was reasonable, given the fact that gang bangers don't share a single 10/22.

I think it's fair to assume that those who possess firearms are more likely to shoot someone than someone who does not possess a firearm.
Just like folks who go to the bank wearing a scream mask are probably more likely to rob it than not.

The bulletin is not very informative