Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 41
  1. #31
    Plinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Sellersburg
    Posts
    55
    May 22 2017 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 25, 2017....

  2. #32

  3. #33
    Expert AmmoManAaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    I-get-around
    Posts
    2,041
    Quote Originally Posted by GPIA7R View Post
    SCOTUS takes no action on Peruta v. California
    That is extremely disappointing.
    "2016: The year that hackers became more trusted than government or reporters."

  4. #34
    SCOTUS will not hear Peruta, on the right to bear arms outside the home. Thomas and Gorsuch dissent from the denial of cert.

  5. #35
    2nd Am carry case from Cal. J. Thomas in dissent, joined by Gorsuch, called CA9 en banc "indefensible"


  6. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by GPIA7R View Post
    2nd Am carry case from Cal. J. Thomas in dissent, joined by Gorsuch, called CA9 en banc "indefensible"

    First post in this thread.

    That snippet is insight into why cert was granted: the overall SCOTUS doesn't think this is a big enough issue. Sometimes, they wait to determine how "big" a problem is - how many times it comes up in different parts of the country and in what contexts - before dedicating their resources to solving it. A variation of this is that, even if they get enough requests to fix a problem for it to be "big enough," they wait for a certain procedural posture before dealing with it.

    The cert-dissenters are basically inviting more litigation on this, to produce more appeals, to provide the necessary weight for the court to review it.

    I can think of a certain Indiana zoo-case that could fit some of the criteria they're looking for.
    Resident Warning Shot Statist.

  7. #37
    Grandmaster miguel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    16T
    Posts
    5,238
    Quote Originally Posted by T.Lex View Post
    That snippet is insight into why cert was granted: the overall SCOTUS doesn't think this is a big enough issue.
    Geez Louise, I would think a case involving a state with 15% of the nation's population would catch their attention!

    Lawyers...can't live with 'em, can't live without 'em.

    p.s. Except for T.Lex and Kirk, of course.
    Fierce defiance

  8. #38
    If the 9 black-robed tyrants can't get the decision right upon hearing this time around, then they are unfit for duty. **** you, SCOTUS, you bunch of chicken****s (except for Thomas and Gorsuch).

  9. #39
    Grandmaster KLB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Porter County
    Posts
    8,439
    Looks like Gorsuch is a big win for those that voted for Trump with the hope of getting a justice with pro 2A leanings.
    They shouldn't just drop a hellfire missile on your café experience...Rand Paul

  10. #40
    Expert
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Rockport
    Posts
    2,366
    Quote Originally Posted by KLB View Post
    Looks like Gorsuch is a big win for those that voted for Trump with the hope of getting a justice with pro 2A leanings.
    Yup. Very happy with that.


Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •