Facing a pro-gun government, anti-gun movement feels defiant

[lonehoosier]

It's about time this anti gunners take a back seat and us to drive strait ahead.

Facing a pro-gun government, anti-gun movement feels defiant
Facing a pro-gun government, anti-gun movement feels defiant | National News | nwitimes.com

 

[gregr]

It's about time this anti gunners take a back seat and us to drive strait ahead.

Facing a pro-gun government, anti-gun movement feels defiant
Facing a pro-gun government, anti-gun movement feels defiant | National News | nwitimes.com

I hope and pray we get advancements such as constitutional carry and national reciprocity.

 

[HoughMade]

Good for them. They've been facing a pro-gun populace for a long, long time.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

Good for them. They've been facing a pro-gun populace for a long, long time.

A wise man is known for saying on INGO, "change the culture, change the world".

 

[rugertoter]

I don't give two craps what the anti gun people think. Poor babies can't get what they want, so it's not fair....they can bite it.

 

[SwikLS]

same ol' playbook...


woe is me, I'm a victim

 

[actaeon277]

They feel like David to the NRA's Goliath?
Could be a reason for that.

 

[Bill of Rights]

A wise man is known for saying on INGO, "change the culture, change the world".

I know you say that all the time, Kirk, but who is the wise man of whom you speak?

Oh wait. Wise. Must be rhino.

 

[themurseman]

I do believe there should be countrywide constitutional carry, but it is a little scary. Is it reasonable to remove all limits to carry?

 

[cce1302]

I do believe there should be countrywide constitutional carry, but it is a little scary. Is it reasonable to remove all limits to carry?

Is it constitutional to put any limits on a right that "shall not be infringed"?

 

[gregr]

Is it constitutional to put any limits on a right that "shall not be infringed"?

Bingo. I could be very tongue-in-cheek and state that many seem to not grasp what "shall not be infringed" means, but the reality of it is, a lot of people I think, are just like themurseman, freedom frightens them...

 

[cce1302]

Yeah that was the kindest response that I could come up with.

 

[Kirk Freeman]

I know you say that all the time, Kirk, but who is the wise man of whom you speak?

Oh wait. Wise. Must be rhino.

Shots fired!

 

[chipbennett]

I do believe there should be countrywide constitutional carry, but it is a little scary. Is it reasonable to remove all limits to carry?

The scary people (i.e. violent criminals and other scofflaws) already carry, despite existing laws. How could constitutional carry be *more* scary?

 

[KellyinAvon]

I do believe there should be countrywide constitutional carry, but it is a little scary. Is it reasonable to remove all limits to carry?

I prefer dangerous freedom to peaceful slavery--Thomas Jefferson.

Keep in mind:

Not one "prohibited person" who can't legally possess a firearm (felons, people adjudicated as mentally deficient, those convicted of domestic violence) will be able to possess a firearm after Constitutional Carry is passed.

There are (arguably) 14 States with Constitutional Carry. Blood isn't running the streets of any of these states, unlike Chicago with Draconian gun laws and blood running in the streets.

Lawful carriers of firearms are some of the most law-abiding people on the planet. According to Dr. John Lott police officers are 7 times more likely to commit crime than we are. (Sorry LEOs, John Lott's numbers)

US v Heller 2010: affirmed that the 2nd Amendment is an individual right ("the people" please...). Licensing people: to be free to speak or assemble, petition the government, worship, to not have soldiers quartered without consent of the owner, to not be subject to unreasonable search and seizure, to have due process, to know of what they are accused, to have an attorney, and to not be subject to cruel and unusual punishment seems a bit frightening.

OK, I'm done.

 

[OakRiver]

I do believe there should be countrywide constitutional carry, but it is a little scary. Is it reasonable to remove all limits to carry?

That depends. What is your understanding of the words "shall not be infringed"?