116th Congressional Session (2019-2020) 2A "related" Legislation A LIST

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • brotherbill3

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 10, 2010
    2,041
    48
    Hamilton Co.
    We do this each session w/ the state IGA legislation - here is the start for FEDERAL Legislation
    (if A mod wants to assume power over it or pin it - go ahead)

    So I did a quick look at Federal lists today too (while between other things) ... I'll update the list(s) as I can and as others feed info here.

    Since Fed session is 2 yrs long - Can we please "TRY" to keep this to the list of things
    and create separate threads for any of these that garner sufficient traction - or that we are pushing for traction ... ?
    (waits for derrail in 3....2....1 ... yeah I've been here a while)

    OK all I got was number and glimpse at titles:

    HR 38 (Reciprocity ?)
    HR 49
    HR 88 (Knife laws ?)
    HR 110
    HR 155 (HPA - revisited ?)
    HR 167
    HR 175


    3 seem good (HR 38, HR 88, HR 155) ; Others Not so much or perhaps do not really apply. I didn't verify much yet.
    I just did a word search in the list for a few key words


    I will come back and TRY (with help from whomever that can - to keep this list up to date ... I expect there will be a LOT of duplication over the 2 yrs.

    Link to 2 Sites useful for tracking and commenting:

    PopVox (https://www.popvox.com/ ) a good site for tracking and it makes sending responses to your Legislators a bit easier (potentially) ...

    and Congress.gov (Ex HR 38 ... https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/38 )
     

    Mongo59

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jul 30, 2018
    4,459
    113
    Purgatory
    If the Dems have this extrasensory power to know that "20% or more" gun transfers go without a background check why not just harness that power to pre-crime the individuals who plan to use them illegally and leave the rest of us alone?
     

    Methane Herder

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 17, 2013
    609
    63
    Pitchfork Union
    I'm pretty sure they use 20% more oxygen than most people. I don't think they produce 20% more work though (thermodynamically speaking) which makes them oxygen thieves.

    MH
     
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 14, 2010
    129
    16
    Any pro-gun bills introduced in the house this year are simply meaningless lip service to the pro-gun base. None of them will happen with a Democrat majority, and we will likely see a number of gun control bills pass the house (to die in the Senate). Republicans had their chance to pass the HPA and reciprocity and whatever else for the last two years, and the leadership flat refused to allow the bills to be voted on.
     

    brotherbill3

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 10, 2010
    2,041
    48
    Hamilton Co.
    Any pro-gun bills introduced in the house this year are simply meaningless lip service to the pro-gun base. None of them will happen with a Democrat majority, and we will likely see a number of gun control bills pass the house (to die in the Senate). Republicans had their chance to pass the HPA and reciprocity and whatever else for the last two years, and the leadership flat refused to allow the bills to be voted on.

    Sadly - there is much truth here. -
    Still - we need to encourage those proffering the good stuff and ... then stand like the old willow on the banks of the river that will not move against all the bad.
    (and we can't know the good from the bad without a play book - .... stay tuned).
     

    GodFearinGunTotin

    Super Moderator
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 22, 2011
    50,836
    113
    Mitchell

    MCgrease08

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    37   0   0
    Mar 14, 2013
    14,415
    149
    Earth
    I'll just leave this here. I think it sums things up pretty well.

    [video=youtube_share;djs2zYBd8RE]http://youtu.be/djs2zYBd8RE[/video]
     

    Alamo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Oct 4, 2010
    8,219
    113
    Texas
    This came through my email. Wonder what the chances are of this 1) passing and 2) states using the funds this way if it does?

    https://www.tactical-life.com/news/nssf-supports-hr-1222-target-practice/

    It passed both chambers and Trump signed it into law:

    https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1222?q={"search":["hr+1222"]}&r=1&s=1

    This bill allows a state to use federal funds to cover a higher percentage of the costs for the construction and expansion of public target ranges. Specifically, a state may use specified federal grant funds to pay up to 90% of such costs (rather than 75%, as under current law). Additionally, amounts provided for these purposes shall remain available for five fiscal years (rather than two, as under current law).

    More here: https://westvirginia.forums.rivals....ship-training-support-act-last-friday.203360/

    The bill has been pushed by the National Shooting Sports Foundation for fourteen years. It has been introduced as 29 different numbered bills over the years and proposed in 15 separate bill packages. These efforts were always cast aside for reasons unrelated to the “Range Bill” but perseverance by the NSSF finally paid off.
     
    Top Bottom