Join INGunOwners For Free
Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 68
  1. #11
    Expert

    User Info Menu

    I'd be fine with 5 year olds. But I figured the drinking age in a lot of states. But 18 is fine as well.

  2. #12
    Master Tombs's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    We already have background checks, it's called a 4473.

    If due process hasn't landed you in prison or a mental asylum, you're usually good to go.

    Are you wanting background checks that don't rely on due process?
    "Fiat justitia ruat caelum" - Trey Gowdy

  3. #13
    Expert

    User Info Menu

    I want ONE backgroundcheck ONE time when you turn 21 or 18 maybe even 16 cause that's when u get your drivers license. But one time is a lot better then every time you purchase a weapon.

  4. #14
    Master Tombs's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Dosproduction View Post
    I want ONE backgroundcheck ONE time when you turn 21 or 18 maybe even 16 cause that's when u get your drivers license. But one time is a lot better then every time you purchase a weapon.
    You realize that'd be LESS effective at the goal than the current system, right?
    "Fiat justitia ruat caelum" - Trey Gowdy

  5. #15
    Grandmaster indykid's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    How far do you go with a background check? Many of these elected morons want all firearm sales to go through a background check. How would that have worked when I gave my daughter a competition rifle for her 16th birthday? What if your child bought you a firearm for Christmas, or any other holiday? Would you need a background check for that?

    Granted it is almost "apples to oranges", but if the second amendment requires a background check, how about the first?

    There really is no answer as long as criminals don't subscribe to the idea that murder is illegal.

  6. #16
    Somewhat Purple-ish rhino's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by abnk View Post
    Rights are not negotiable.
    Amen.

    Forgetting that always has a worse outcome in the long run than any compromise.



    "The people shall have a right to bear arms, for the defense of themselves and the State."
    INDIANA CONSTITUTION
    Article 1 - Bill of Rights - Section 32

    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

    To prevail you must ACT!

  7. #17
    Master d.kaufman's Avatar

    User Info Menu


  8. #18
    Grandmaster

    User Info Menu

    "Background Checks" formerly called "universal background checks" and "the gun show loophole" is code language the anti-gun dems use for registration. Registration is the first step to confiscation.
    -----------------------------------------------
    Done, done, and Iím on to the next one...
    -----------------------------------------------

  9. #19
    Expert

    User Info Menu

    So if you background check every American one time then note on there license they are able to carry/own guns how would this be less effective. Everyone is checked, gov doesent know who owns guns/carry and the only time a "new check happens" is after you have been convicted you receive a new license. Don't have to ever have the second check. This gets rid of the back door registration that the current FFL/NICS system sorta creates. And as far as your daughter getting a gun from you maybe make it younger like 5 yr olds get there ids or something.

  10. #20
    Expert

    User Info Menu

    Also so where clear I want constitutional carry and you shouldent be free if you can't be trusted with a weapon. But I'm trying to think of a practical way to get rid of the backdoor registration we have and appease the unappeasable Dems.


Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Button Dodge