If they can get a few of the listed firearms off this list, then they can say they 'supported the Second Amendment,' right...???
That is clearly the tactic the anti-gunners have used so successfully over the years, asking to ban 100 things, then the RINOs ever-so-courageously knock it down to only banning 50 things, and expect us to re-elect them.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1296/text
The 'lesser of two evils' is still evil.
Anyone who even brings up the topic of 'banning' firearms, much less votes to do so, should be barred from holding public office, as they are clearly not only a fool, but a dishonest one as well, as they swore an oath to uphold the Constitution, INCLUDING the Second Amendment. If they are so stupid, and so ignorant of history, that they don't grasp the concept that the Second Amendment protects 'military-style' firearms MORE THAN 'sporting' firearms, then they are again, unworthy of holding public office.
That is clearly the tactic the anti-gunners have used so successfully over the years, asking to ban 100 things, then the RINOs ever-so-courageously knock it down to only banning 50 things, and expect us to re-elect them.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/1296/text
The 'lesser of two evils' is still evil.
Anyone who even brings up the topic of 'banning' firearms, much less votes to do so, should be barred from holding public office, as they are clearly not only a fool, but a dishonest one as well, as they swore an oath to uphold the Constitution, INCLUDING the Second Amendment. If they are so stupid, and so ignorant of history, that they don't grasp the concept that the Second Amendment protects 'military-style' firearms MORE THAN 'sporting' firearms, then they are again, unworthy of holding public office.