Join INGunOwners For Free
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: 8 states considering 2A Sanctuary Compact

  1. #1
    Marksman HKUSP's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    8 states considering 2A Sanctuary Compact

    The video speaks for itself. Indiana? Are you listening?

    Warning! Driver carries MORE than $20 in ammunition.

  2. #2
    Cannon Fodder Wolfhound's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    That is great. Seems like a great idea and I back it 100%. I lived in Alabama and actually held a LTC in both Alabama and Indiana while I was in the service. I found Indiana to be a little more gun friendly than Alabama back in the 90's.
    Veterans Crisis Line 1-800-273-8255 press 1 to talk to someone now or text 838255 available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.

  3. #3
    Marksman HKUSP's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    I'm left with a couple of questions. First, do we call the AG or our legislative reps? Some states handle things like this with agreements like reciprocity.

    Secondly, is this just another thing Indiana will ignore like Constitutional Carry because the leadership is comfortable with their status quo and certain in their broad majority?
    Politicians tend to get lazy when there's no real competition.
    Warning! Driver carries MORE than $20 in ammunition.

  4. #4
    Grandmaster HoughMade's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    States can refuse to enforce federal law or assist the feds in enforcing federal law.

    Full stop.

    Any state law or groups of states with laws, that proposes to tell the feds what they can or cannot do within a state is complete and utter nonsense.
    ​Bullies suck. They also make you stronger.

  5. #5
    Expert BigRed's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    There's always secession!

  6. #6
    Grandmaster HoughMade's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by BigRed View Post
    There's always secession!
    What do you think this is?
    ​Bullies suck. They also make you stronger.

  7. #7
    Grandmaster HoughMade's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    U.S. Constitution-

    Article I

    Section 10

    Paragraph 3:

    3: No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
    Is this going to be one of those things where we decide which parts of the Constitution we like and which parts we don't like?
    ​Bullies suck. They also make you stronger.

  8. #8
    Expert BigRed's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by HoughMade View Post
    U.S. Constitution-

    Article I

    Section 10

    Paragraph 3:



    Is this going to be one of those things where we decide which parts of the Constitution we like and which parts we don't like?

    A State asserting its sovereignty and walking away on its own does not require a pact with another State. Following the walking away, the Constitution does not apply.

  9. #9
    Grandmaster HoughMade's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by BigRed View Post
    A State asserting its sovereignty and walking away on its own does not require a pact with another State. Following the walking away, the Constitution does not apply.
    So we agree that this purported "compact" is secession, then.
    ​Bullies suck. They also make you stronger.

  10. #10
    Expert BigRed's Avatar

    User Info Menu

    I did not speak to this "compact".


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •