The Walking Dead Thread - Part 2

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • danielocean03

    Come in, Manacle Shark.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Nov 23, 2008
    6,721
    48
    Hamilton County
    Continue on here!

    3af1344357ec4edcde41ccd28cf77943.jpg
     

    dusty88

    Master
    Local Business Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Aug 11, 2014
    3,179
    83
    United States
    I'll repost my question from just before the other thread was closed:

    Didn't Rick tell Morgan that he wasn't taking chances anymore?

    I think the risk/reward ratio changes when you are out of food

    Not to mention their prior experience with tyrants indicates they need to act
     

    VERT

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    23   0   0
    Jan 4, 2009
    9,801
    113
    Seymour
    I think the risk/reward ratio changes when you are out of food

    Not to mention their prior experience with tyrants indicates they need to act

    Sums it up pretty well. Eventually the other group just ends up attacking anyway. Still not sure I would just jump into a preemptive strike without a lot of Intel.
     

    Libertarian01

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Jan 12, 2009
    6,006
    113
    Fort Wayne
    If I was with Hilltop I sure as hell would want another leader besides Gregory.

    His attitude alone with Maggie was pure horsecrap. It not only was extremely rude, but she bent him over HARD when the tables were turned. That isn't in Maggie's character normally. It was her natural response to being called Natalie (more than once) along with the other degrading treatment.

    A leader has to lead his/her own people, but he/she also has to be diplomatic with others. His total lack of diplomacy cost his own group far more than it should have, and in the long game may well have poisoned relations between Ricks group and his own.

    They don't need a leader like that. That is more harm than good in my opinion.

    Doug
     
    Top Bottom