I understand that 100%.
If you WANT to be trained, then MANDATORY training shouldn't be a problem, now should it? Get where I'm going with this?
Any other explanation needed can be referred back to my other post.
the nonsensical nature of this post combined with the implied disdain for any opposing thought provides me with epic lulz
I don't need training to exercise a constitutional right safely.
Like calling those who support the notion of manditory training "unconstitutionalists" or "gun control advocates"? That's a little harsh and comical too.
Inserted another word for increased accuracy... And just because YOU don't need training does not mean others don't.
And regarding the last part, it's not a "free" country. There are laws, and some states feel the need to have them more than others do. Is it a P.I.T.A. to get a little training to "exercise a constitutional right"? Sure... That doesn't mean the right has been taken away.
Like calling those who support the notion of manditory training "unconstitutionalists" or "gun control advocates"? That's a little harsh and comical too.
Inserted another word for increased accuracy... And just because YOU don't need training does not mean others don't.
And regarding the last part, it's not a "free" country. There are laws, and some states feel the need to have them more than others do. Is it a P.I.T.A. to get a little training to "exercise a constitutional right"? Sure... That doesn't mean the right has been taken away.
You get used to itIt's a tough road to travel when you think you're right and everyone else is wrong.
No you don't.
Like calling those who support the notion of manditory training "unconstitutionalists" or "gun control advocates"? That's a little harsh and comical too.
Inserted another word for increased accuracy... And just because YOU don't need training does not mean others don't.
And regarding the last part, it's not a "free" country. There are laws, and some states feel the need to have them more than others do. Is it a P.I.T.A. to get a little training to "exercise a constitutional right"? Sure... That doesn't mean the right has been taken away.
Like calling those who support the notion of manditory training "unconstitutionalists" or "gun control advocates"? That's a little harsh and comical too.
Inserted another word for increased accuracy... And just because YOU don't need training does not mean others don't.
And regarding the last part, it's not a "free" country. There are laws, and some states feel the need to have them more than others do. Is it a P.I.T.A. to get a little training to "exercise a constitutional right"? Sure... That doesn't mean the right has been taken away.
i support the OP. LTCH permits should be restricted to trained indviduals only. getting to take my gun in other states is better than making it easy for any1 to get a permit
i support the OP. LTCH permits should be restricted to trained indviduals only. getting to take my gun in other states is better than making it easy for any1 to get a permit
And you don't think that it'd be 100000x worse out there if said kids had no mandatory, only voluntary formal driver's training, and were left with the option to simply teach themselves?
Riiiiggghhhhttt......
According to my logic, you should want to be trained, therefore, it shouldn't be an issue for training to be mandatory. Sorry that I simply made a few statements addressing some of the points brought up, as they were not the basis of my whole thought process.
Last I checked, formal Driver's Ed is not mandated in Indiana. Helps you get your permit earlier (16 instead of 16 and 6 months IIRC). So what's your point?