Doctors required to ask about guns in the home. Do you have to answer?

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Prometheus

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 20, 2008
    4,462
    48
    Northern Indiana
    Last edited:

    eldirector

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Apr 29, 2009
    14,677
    113
    Brownsburg, IN
    Politicians lie at will.

    Doctors are allowed (required) to violate their oath.

    No reason to answer anything truthfully unless it gains you something.

    Sad state of affairs.
     

    LANShark42

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Dec 24, 2012
    2,248
    48
    Evansville
    Let's see... Who do I believe? Snopes, a trusted anti-hoax site? Or a blog site no one has ever heard of. I trust Snopes. 13C? Not so much. It was a nice try to try to (right off the bat) discredit Snopes by claiming old information. Guess that was 13C's only hope at any credibility. Spectacular fail...
     

    techres

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Industry Partner
    Rating - 100%
    27   0   0
    Mar 14, 2008
    6,479
    38
    1
    "Yes, I have guns and would love to take you to the range if you want to learn safe firearm handling and use! When do you want to go?"
     

    giovani

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 8, 2012
    1,303
    38
    I have decided that if a medical professional asks me any question not pertaining to the realm of medicine, my only statement will be , lets just try to keep focused doc.
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    32,164
    77
    Camby area
    I'd be responding with "nope, none in my house. I prefer to rely on rabid badgers for defense."

    Knee jerk response is "none of your damn business" but thats pretty much a "yes" when you read between the lines. Most anti gunners are just going to say no, and only pro gunners (for the most part) would put up a fight.

    My kids are taught not to talk about our guns, and the wife knows if anyone asks the answer is no. My angle is even if a worried mother asks "Do you have any guns in your house?" over concern about a play date we are hosting the short answer is "NO".

    Long answer is "No guns in the house that are not under lock and key at all times and are therefore out of reach, so effectively there are no guns you need to worry about in our home. Due to my secure storage, my guns are no more accessible to your kids than my neighbor's guns."
     

    jdhaines

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Feb 24, 2009
    1,550
    38
    Toledo, OH
    Let's see... Who do I believe? Snopes, a trusted anti-hoax site? Or a blog site no one has ever heard of. I trust Snopes. 13C? Not so much. It was a nice try to try to (right off the bat) discredit Snopes by claiming old information. Guess that was 13C's only hope at any credibility. Spectacular fail...

    Just wait, someone will be along to tell you everything on Snopes is owned by Obama's buddies and false. Anytime you use it to debunk anything you're helping the left to kill children, steal guns, and win hearts and minds.
     

    Prometheus

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 20, 2008
    4,462
    48
    Northern Indiana
    Let's see... Who do I believe? Snopes, a trusted anti-hoax site? Or a blog site no one has ever heard of. I trust Snopes. 13C? Not so much. It was a nice try to try to (right off the bat) discredit Snopes by claiming old information. Guess that was 13C's only hope at any credibility. Spectacular fail...

    Discredit or point out their hatred of guns and outdated information?

    So you didn't bother to read that snopes says nothing about the Obama care mandate and instead focuses on old medicare rules?

    Would you believe snipes over Andrew Napalitono?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fygzmt55XsI&feature=youtube_gdata_player
     

    DragonGunner

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Mar 14, 2010
    5,586
    113
    N. Central IN
    Have guns? "No Doc, but I do have a trampiline and swimming pool that hurt and kill 10 times as many children as guns....you didn't ask about those so guess those are ok. I also have kitchen knives, rope, chainsaw, car, truck, atv.....any other question....Oh now on to the sex life questions....can I just get a shot for the hayfever already doc?"
     

    level.eleven

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 12, 2009
    4,673
    48
    Let's see... Who do I believe? Snopes, a trusted anti-hoax site? Or a blog site no one has ever heard of. I trust Snopes. 13C? Not so much. It was a nice try to try to (right off the bat) discredit Snopes by claiming old information. Guess that was 13C's only hope at any credibility. Spectacular fail...

    It also seems that it would be rather easy, to you know, go ahead and cite your claim. Of course, then there wouldn't be any outrage. Some basic proofreading would help the blog as well.
     

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    Lying on any federal matter is a federal crime.



    Smallest Lie to Federal Agent Is a Crime, High Court Rules - Los Angeles Times

    18 U.S.C. § 1001 : US Code - Section 1001

    (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully— (1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
    (2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
    (3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
    shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
    (b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
    (c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to— (1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
    (2) any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
     
    Top Bottom