Hypocrisy on the Stormy Daniels front

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • OakRiver

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 12, 2014
    15,013
    77
    IN
    WTF?

    Michael has been a great advocate in many ways. I’m tremendously grateful to him for aggressively representing me in my fight to regain my voice. But in other ways Michael has not treated me with the respect and deference an attorney should show to a client.

    Seriously? He's spending her gofundme. He started another gofundme in her name. And she's grateful? He aggressively lost in court. He didn't represent her. I guess she's so used to getting ****ed anymore that she doesn't notice when she's getting ****ed.
    Yup.
    He did not inform her how her GoFundMe was being spent, did not inform her that he was opening a second GoFundMe, and did not inform her that she was suing a sitting POTUS.... but she isn't sure whether she will retain him as counsel.
     

    Fargo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Mar 11, 2009
    7,575
    63
    In a state of acute Pork-i-docis
    Yup.
    He did not inform her how her GoFundMe was being spent, did not inform her that he was opening a second GoFundMe, and did not inform her that she was suing a sitting POTUS.... but she isn't sure whether she will retain him as counsel.
    Mmmmm between Clifford and Avenati, I am going to be hard pressed to buy that either of them is being even mostly truthful...

    It is just baffling to me that this is an event that Trump is going to double dog deny. Pretty much everyone believes he boinked her and no one really cares. He was a known quantity as regards monogamy and marital fidelity way before this.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    Mmmmm between Clifford and Avenati, I am going to be hard pressed to buy that either of them is being even mostly truthful...

    It is just baffling to me that this is an event that Trump is going to double dog deny. Pretty much everyone believes he boinked her and no one really cares. He was a known quantity as regards monogamy and marital fidelity way before this.
    One gets the feeling that the wind could've been taken out of the sails long ago if he just owned it and moved on.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    25,638
    149
    Federal judge orders Stormy Daniels to pay President Donald Trump $293,052.33 in attorneys' fees in her defamation case against the president
    Nice work Avenati filing this debacle on behalf of your client against her wishes.
     

    AmmoManAaron

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    37   0   0
    Feb 20, 2015
    3,334
    83
    I-get-around

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,236
    149
    Columbus, OH


    Well, supposedly the FBI also believed Steele was a reliable source

    I see two possible conclusions. One, what the FBI believes is whatever conveniently advances their agenda or two, the current FBI can't find its ass with both hands
     

    nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    11,794
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    Well, supposedly the FBI also believed Steele was a reliable source

    I see two possible conclusions. One, what the FBI believes is whatever conveniently advances their agenda or two, the current FBI can't find its ass with both hands

    I believe there is a big chunk of truth in both of those conclusions.
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,236
    149
    Columbus, OH
    It's sad really, when I was a kid I bought into the Straight Edge G-man image. Even later when I became familiar with the Hoover era/legacy I still sort of believed that the rank and file were not corrupt/corrupted

    I still hold out hope that those rank and file will eventually leak or testify to clean up the agency, but I'm beginning to think it could be just like any other bureaucracy these days.

    Perhaps after Trump gets re-elected they'll feel more confident that coming forward will accomplish more than just setting fire to their own careers
     

    JettaKnight

    Я з Україною
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 13, 2010
    26,558
    113
    Fort Wayne
    It's sad really, when I was a kid I bought into the Straight Edge G-man image. Even later when I became familiar with the Hoover era/legacy I still sort of believed that the rank and file were not corrupt/corrupted

    I still hold out hope that those rank and file will eventually leak or testify to clean up the agency, but I'm beginning to think it could be just like any other bureaucracy these days.

    Perhaps after Trump gets re-elected they'll feel more confident that coming forward will accomplish more than just setting fire to their own careers

    I don't think you understand what that means...
     

    BugI02

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 4, 2013
    32,236
    149
    Columbus, OH
    Word with different definitions.

    In this case, likely being upstanding... stale, neutral, regular, basic...

    Not the punk anti-alcohol/drug movement.

    Were you even walking among us during the punk era? You're going to explain punk to someone who lived it? I'm not sure you know what hubris means

    Do you know what a SHARP is without looking it up?
     
    Top Bottom