I haven't researched these terms beyond the couple of Foxnews articles I've read in the past couple weeks or so, so please correct me on any inaccuracies.
"Quiet Quitting" I think refers to employees who are slowing their production to the very minimum to avoid being fired without actually quitting. They are doing this because management is reducing staffing while increasing workloads without any additional compensation, benefits, or recognition.
"Quiet Firing" as I understand it is managers deliberately increasing workloads, eliminating benefits or opportunities for advancement in order to drive away specific employees. The impetus for this may be profit or personal reasons.
Do any of you see this happening? Is this really a thing?
"Quiet Quitting" I think refers to employees who are slowing their production to the very minimum to avoid being fired without actually quitting. They are doing this because management is reducing staffing while increasing workloads without any additional compensation, benefits, or recognition.
"Quiet Firing" as I understand it is managers deliberately increasing workloads, eliminating benefits or opportunities for advancement in order to drive away specific employees. The impetus for this may be profit or personal reasons.
Do any of you see this happening? Is this really a thing?