Another new "rule" incoming? No more private sales without a ffl involved?

[Kirk Freeman]

Loper Bright:

Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo - SCOTUSblog

Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court

www.scotusblog.com

 

[2A_Tom]

It doesn't matter what you say...

 

[jwamplerusa]

It doesn't matter what you say...

Probably, but I will not be silent while the Constitution is violated as well as the Rights that document guarantees me and mine.

A Republic, if you can keep it.

I want to keep it, and reinvigorate it.

 

[2A_Tom]

Sorry, I have lost hope.

The republic, I am sorry is an illusion.

 

[KLB]

Loper Bright:

Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo - SCOTUSblog

Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court

www.scotusblog.com

Now that looks promising. I know Thomas and Gorsuch are both waiting for a good case to tackle that one.

 

[actaeon277]

I think that when you write a legislator, or governor, they just look for "I am for/against such and such resolution/proposal"

And that's all they (staff) read.
Then they (staff) mark a tick in a column

 

[ditcherman]

I think that when you write a legislator, or governor, they just look for "I am for/against such and such resolution/proposal"

And that's all they (staff) read.
Then they (staff) mark a tick in a column

Well, you have more faith than me, that they read them and put a tick in a column.

 

[KLB]

Well, you have more faith than me, that they read them and put a tick in a column.

Politicians probably do. I don't know that these government agencies give a though.

 

[loudgroove]

Politicians probably do. I don't know that these government agencies give a though.

I think politicians only care about staying in power and whatever agenda their party is shoving down our throats at any given moment.

 

[KLB]

I think politicians only care about staying in power and whatever agenda their party is shoving down our throats at any given moment.

Knowing which way the wind is blowing can be part of that.

 

[DDadams]

The ending date for the comment period is approaching FAST.

Please if you haven't - leave a comment on the registry in opposition and send it to everyone you know.

 

[Mij]

Am I seeing a Supreme Court case in the next few days regarding non-elected agencies having to much authority over law makers? Read the article earlier, but didn’t understand the legal language.

 

[KLB]

Am I seeing a Supreme Court case in the next few days regarding non-elected agencies having to much authority over law makers? Read the article earlier, but didn’t understand the legal language.

Maybe you are thinking of the Bump stock case. It is about the agency rewriting law, not about having too much authority over Congress. They are supposed to do what Congress tells them in the law, not decide that since Congress won't change the law, they will do it for them.

 

[KellyinAvon]

Am I seeing a Supreme Court case in the next few days regarding non-elected agencies having to much authority over law makers? Read the article earlier, but didn’t understand the legal language.

Many fronts on this one:

Bumpstock case

Several pistol brace cases

Big driver is West Virginia v EPA 2022: SCOTUS pointed out EPA ain't Congress/Article 1.1

 

[Griz375]

I think that when you write a legislator, or governor, they just look for "I am for/against such and such resolution/proposal"

And that's all they (staff) read.
Then they (staff) mark a tick in a column

^^^^
That's exactly how it goes!!
The tobacco industry could have learned much about filtering and blowing smoke from any large entity but FedGov would be near the top of the pile.

And don't get me going on 'Phone Trees'!!!

 

[Griz375]

I knew the day would come, but I really hoped it wouldn't be this soon.

I hope I'm misunderstanding this or that indiana state law will still allow us our rights but I'm definitely no lawyer.



Link added per request.

I'm not a lawyer nor even approaching 'Expert' on the US Constitution but as I understand it, Federal law supersedes laws enacted by a lower level of Govt.
For now, based on the makeup of SCOTUS, I don't see this getting very far.

Don't worry though; the SD/SJW/OWG crowd planted the seed of expanding both the senate and SCOTUS long ago so the see a clear path to rejigging the US Constitution more to their liking.

That would include dealing with those pesky Amendments like 2A.

Having said that, all y'all better read up on Progressive-Liberal or Social Democrat politics with a focus focus on "Incrementalism".
Recommended reading would be how the English-as-a-First-Language (Native English Speaking) British Commonwealth countries have clamped down hard on private Firearms ownership, acquisition & usage.

The big factor is The US Constitution and 2A are penned in blood and won.
The constitutions of AUS, Canada & NZ were all "granted" by UK when it was determined these former colonies were mature enough to be self governing.

I think that's because GB learned from the fairly considerable drubbing they took at the hands of of an underfunded and much smaller group of 'Colonists' about 275 ± years ago in N. America.

"Rule Britannia" is just a sidebar in history and where much of the current list of world issues and strife can be traced back to.

America is already in a multi-front war for survival. There's the obvious struggles with Muslim Terrorists and PRC PLUS Putin's Gang but many don't acknowledge the larger more insidious foe; the alliance of SJW-Marxist politicians and the very Leftist civil service Bureaucracy.

To put the above in some perspective, I'm a Canadian here on a GC so I've watched how the transition from Free People to being registering as a serf can happen in less than a century with hardly any blood being spilled.

In the case of Canada, the National Police Force is a willing and complicit ally in this.

Because of the vast differences in how the two nations are governed, The Horseman create their own regulations and laws, depriving the citizenry of their rights.

At no time I'm aware of has any Canadian FedGov enforced the chain of command with the RCMP. The govt, it's bureaucrats and the SCofC, being all appointed by the Party in Power from a pool of almost exclusively Socialist Lawyers and lower court Justices does nothing to protect anyone but themselves, their position, power, income and pensions.

I'll stop ranting now but there's no way to vote yourselves out of this mess.

 

[Remington 90T]

The ATF attempting to redefine statutory definitions is why their rule regarding defining a brace as a "machine gun" failed. The same will happen here, if they try the same tactic.

ATF is also floating the idea of Pulling FFL Licenses of low volume dealers.

 

[Mgderf]

ATF is also floating the idea of Pulling FFL Licenses of low volume dealers.

Seriously doubt if that would pass true constitutional muster either, if it were actually challenged.

 

[chipbennett]

ATF is also floating the idea of Pulling FFL Licenses of low volume dealers.

So, people with such low volume of gun sales that ATF pulls their FFL? That is tacit acknowledgement that AFT does not consider such people to be "in the buiness".

Solid own-goal there, ATF.