Rick Mason
Sharpshooter
Two opposing viewpoints on the morality of Christians using firearms. I may be a little biased here, but it sure seems as if the anti-viewpoint was written perhaps by an 8th grader. The strawmen are plenty and the logic is weak. For example:
"Moreover, relying on a weapon to keep me safe raises a spiritual question: am I placing my faith in guns or God? Whom do I trust will save and protect me? My gun, or God?"
This would be a much more compelling argument if the presenter would only promise to eschew seat belts, door locks, life and health insurance, fire extinguishers, the police, and any other tool, object, or situation that he relies upon to "keep him safe".
Guns or Roses?
"Moreover, relying on a weapon to keep me safe raises a spiritual question: am I placing my faith in guns or God? Whom do I trust will save and protect me? My gun, or God?"
This would be a much more compelling argument if the presenter would only promise to eschew seat belts, door locks, life and health insurance, fire extinguishers, the police, and any other tool, object, or situation that he relies upon to "keep him safe".
Guns or Roses?