How I see it.

[Garb]

Option A: We keep electing the same good ole boys, they keep spending us into oblivion, the system collapses, and we're in a depression that will make the one in 1930 look like a pothole.

Option B: We elect responsible individuals who actively pursue conservative fiscal policies and work to cut welfare and wasteful government spending. Commies and welfare recipients revolt, sending the country into turmoil.

To me, it feels like we're screwed either way. The backlash from the average welfare recipient probably won't be a big deal, but is anyone with me in the thinking that liberals won't stand by and watch their utopia be taken away peacefully? I feel like we're kinda screwed at this point either way. BTW, these scenarios are not taking into account possible terrorist attacks, and the issue with the Mexican border, as well as how illegals and the drug cartels might react if we start shipping them back to where they came from. Am I alone here?

 

[Cpt Caveman]

Nope you aren't alone, just vocal.I don't think we are that close to riots in the streets but this election might cause some if the democrats get caught cheating at the polls .

 

[Liberty's Teeth]

Nope you aren't alone, just vocal.I don't think we are that close to riots in the streets but this election might cause some if the democrats get caught cheating at the polls .

I second what will happen if they get caught.

 

[Blackhawk2001]

I suspect riots are more possible if the Dems can convince enough of their drones that the elections were "stolen". Our side is much more likely to take up legal measures to protest cheating.

 

[The Bubba Effect]

Option B: We elect responsible individuals who actively pursue conservative fiscal policies and work to cut welfare and wasteful government spending. Commies and welfare recipients revolt, sending the country into turmoil.

Option B please. That sounds just fine to me.

 

[G_Stines]

Option A: We keep electing the same good ole boys, they keep spending us into oblivion, the system collapses, and we're in a depression that will make the one in 1930 look like a pothole.

Option B: We elect responsible individuals who actively pursue conservative fiscal policies and work to cut welfare and wasteful government spending. Commies and welfare recipients revolt, sending the country into turmoil.

Option B please. That sounds just fine to me.

Turmoil is like a fire, it is destructive and creative at the same time. It removes what was to make room for whats new. I put in a second Vote for option B. Our country was born of turmoil, we might as well be born again or go out the same way: Fighting. Either is fine with me.

 

[1LuvGuns]

Option B: I'd love to watch the liberals have a meltdown.

 

[printcraft]

B

Far less destructive and costly on the whole.

 

[rambone]

Option A will lead to our enslavement.

 

[Leadeye]

I don't buy into any of the apocalyptic scenarios. You will just see a gradual slide in the standard of living. The US will eventually look like Mexico does today.

 

[mrjarrell]

I have to choose option C: None of the Above.

Option B isn't a good option, since it leave too much "non-wasteful" spending in their grasp. They get to determine what's non-wasteful and all too often that's darned near everything. Welfare's not going to be reformed again in our lifetimes and the last time that happened it was a dem that took it on and did it, not a rep. They all love their entitlements and like giving our money away to their privileged classes. The reps want tax cuts. That sounds fine, until you realise that they won't balance those with spending cuts. Nope. Neither party has the courage to do the right thing and neither do the voters.