thoughts on sig p250 .40 and .357 sig?

[trigger_happy57]

thinking about picking up a sig p250 .40 with 3 mags and a .357 sig barrel anybody have any experience with these any pros or cons?

 

[GBuck]

I had one, took it to the range to shoot, and sold it the next day. The trigger was LONG and not fun. I probably could have learned to be effective with it, but at the time I did not have the patience for it.

 

[trigger_happy57]

thats kinda what i am worried about but was curious what ingo members had to say its a really good price and its a sig but that doesnt mean its great just trying to get some feedback and opinions before i take the plunge to purchase one

 

[trigger_happy57]

also did you try carrying curious how easy it would be to carry for an some what small frame guy?

 

[cordex]

The good:
Very smooth double-action pull
Swappable frames/caliber conversions

The bad:
Harder to find holsters than more common designs
Expensive magazines
Very long trigger reset

 

[GBuck]

I carried it, it was fine. Small and concealable, but big enough to not look stupid OC. The quality of the gun was clearly great, it was just the actual shooting of it I didn't care for.

 

[Indy_Guy_77]

Also be aware:

There's an "old style" frame, and a "new style" frame.

Their respective magazines are NOT interchangeable. Molded holsters may not be compatible, either.

Old style frames = rounded accessory rail

New style frames = flat Picatinny-style rail

-J-

 

[trigger_happy57]

thats always good to know any thoughts on the .357 sig round with it as far as recoil and how easy it is to get back on target? i never shot one so just curious