Free Market? Capitalism? Ha, never existed.

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Jack Ryan

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 2, 2008
    5,864
    36
    How can something be a government agency AND a "corporation" at the same time? How can a government agency claim to protect and serve the "interests of all " while making profits off a private patent?

    http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/1998/04/broydo.html

    By Leora Broydo
    April 7, 1998

    It's a practice as old as farming itself: As sure as the rooster crows at dawn, farmers save seeds from one growing season and plant them in the next. In South America, poor farmers use knowledge passed down over centuries to select seeds best suited to the local climate and soil.

    A new genetic technology, patented in March, will make it possible for companies to sell seeds that will only work for one growing season, so farmers have to buy each time they plant. Crops will grow as usual, but their seeds in turn will be duds, unable to germinate. Seeds of this kind are expected to come to market by 2004.

    Who will challenge this affront to the age-old practice of seed saving? The USDA? "Not on American soil, bucko!" Unlikely. USDA is the inventor.

    Using taxpayer money, about $229,000, USDA created the new "technology protection system" with Delta and Pine Land Company, the nation's largest producer of cotton seeds with a 73 percent market share. Together they hold the patent. Public-private partnerships are not at all unusual at USDA—two recent USDA inventions, a spray to prevent salmonella in chickens and a feed that will reduce water-polluting phosphorous content in animal waste, were both developed using private funds—but this one stands out because it was not done to improve food safety, the environment, crop viability, or consumer choice. The research was done, according to the USDA inventor himself, to improve the bottom lines of American corporations

    Seed saving may be good for farmers, but it's not good for the chemical and seed companies. Biotech seed companies have managed to control the "problem" of seed saving in this country by policing farmers. Monsanto requires that buyers of its Roundup Ready seeds agree to use them only once, and hires Pinkerton investigators to root out violators.

    What's it called when the government owns corporations? Funds them? Is finacially entertwined with them?
     

    jsgolfman

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 20, 2008
    1,999
    38
    Greenwood
    True, good distinction. An interesting debate going on right now is the potential bailout of the newspaper industry. If that happens, the response from the populace will be a good thing to watch. If they "storm the gates", actually or metaphorically, then all is not lost. However, if they let that slide then all is truly lost.
     

    Jack Ryan

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 2, 2008
    5,864
    36
    True, good distinction. An interesting debate going on right now is the potential bailout of the newspaper industry. If that happens, the response from the populace will be a good thing to watch. If they "storm the gates", actually or metaphorically, then all is not lost. However, if they let that slide then all is truly lost.

    How you going to say no to them when they have already handed out the newpaper corporation and employees money to the rest of the nation just for the asking and a long history of doing just that?

    How are you going to call it "free speach" or freadom of the press when they are in fact a branch of the government?
     

    Gritch

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jan 13, 2009
    144
    18
    Portage
    I had a teacher a few years ago who wrote a book called Corporatism. It was mostly conspiracy stuff, but he defined what you are talking about as corporatism.
     

    Jack Ryan

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Nov 2, 2008
    5,864
    36
    I had a teacher a few years ago who wrote a book called Corporatism. It was mostly conspiracy stuff, but he defined what you are talking about as corporatism.

    Most books will describe the point where business and government merge as fascism.

    Americans don't like to hear that word associated with this country. We are big on making up new words and redefining the language until it sounds like something that suits us and pacifies the masses.

    It's so much easier than actually taking any action to correct what we don't like.
     
    Top Bottom