No Firearms Sign at Church's Chicken

[singlesix]

I ate at Church once and once only; the chicken tasted like it was cooked in week old oil.

 

[esrice]

Out of curiosity which store was this?

Shelby and Troy.

You should of been capped in the knee for making a poor decision about where to eat.

I actually didn't eat there. In fact, I had a car full of the Colonel's at the time. Someone in our party wanted "cajun rice", so we stopped at the Churchs.

 

[Hkindiana]

Yes they CAN post it, but it carries no legal weight. Now, if you carried in there, they discovered it, and then asked you to leave, you must leave under threat of illegal trespassing. But just posting it doesn't mean going CC is suddenly illegal.

It doesn't make your CC illegal, but it DOES mean you ARE trespassing, since you are on private property doing something against which is legally posted

 

[E5RANGER375]

i wont eat there because they are mostly in the hood areas and i dont wanna take a chance with cleanliness issues. plus, i dont wanna stop anywhere in the hood for safety reasons. concealed means concealed. also, i think its funny they think they own the sidewalks.

 

[Armed-N-Ready]

WTF

I would not give money to any business that wants to tell me what I can or cannot do, especially if it involves a constitutional right. What would they do if you tied a string to your gun and dragged it in behind you ...... nothing said about dragging a firearm only carrying one.

 

[SMiller]

Is the food better or worse then KFC?

 

[sj kahr k40]

It doesn't make your CC illegal, but it DOES mean you ARE trespassing, since you are on private property doing something against which is legally posted

I think you have to be asked to leave before you are considered trespassing.

 

[Round Ball]

easy enough don't carry don't go

 

[Hkindiana]

I think you have to be asked to leave before you are considered trespassing.

If someone has a " no hunting" sign posted on their property, and you hunt there anyway, they do not have to ask you to leave before you are considered to be trespassing. It is the same principal - they have a notice posted, so if you disobey their legally posted notice on their private property, you ARE trespassing.

 

[sj kahr k40]

If someone has a " no hunting" sign posted on their property, and you hunt there anyway, they do not have to ask you to leave before you are considered to be trespassing. It is the same principal - they have a notice posted, so if you disobey their legally posted notice on their private property, you ARE trespassing.

Can you quote the IC on legally posted signs?

 

[esrice]

I think you have to be asked to leave before you are considered trespassing.

This is how I also understand it.

A sign carries no legal weight-- trespassing or otherwise.

 

[Hkindiana]

This is how I also understand it.

A sign carries no legal weight-- trespassing or otherwise.

The SIGN is in effect asking you to leave, so if you ignore it, then you ARE trespassing

 

[sj kahr k40]

Can you quote the IC on legally posted signs?

Again, quote the IC

 

[Hkindiana]

The sign is a legal notice.

 

[sj kahr k40]

The sign is a legal notice.

Where does the Indiana Code (IC) say this?

 

[esrice]

The sign is a legal notice.

Do you have an IC code for that?

 

[ATM]

Of course, CC is the ONLY way to carry. I'm just sayin'

Why you try to sneak this in? You know I'm going to see it, right?





Oh yeah... and signs do not carry weight of law in Indiana.

 

[Hkindiana]

Don't get me wrong, I CC with my permit, and I love the rights that I have which allow me to do so. However, I respect others rights with regards to their private property. I find it ironic that the same people who scream for their rights to not be taken away, are so willing to disregard others rights when it suits them. So you as a hunter think you have the right to trespass on my private property and hunt, even though i have it clearly posted that you can't, simply because you have a hunting license? It's the SAME scenario. You as a LICENSED hunter have the right to hunt on private property when the landowner allows you to. Otherwise, your license is useless on his private property.

 

[IndyMonkey]

Don't get me wrong, I CC with my permit, and I love the rights that I have which allow me to do so. However, I respect others rights with regards to their private property. I find it ironic that the same people who scream for their rights to not be taken away, are so willing to disregard others rights when it suits them. So you as a hunter think you have the right to trespass on my private property and hunt, even though i have it clearly posted that you can't, simply because you have a hunting license? It's the SAME scenario. You as a LICENSED hunter have the right to hunt on private property when the landowner allows you to. Otherwise, your license is useless on his private property.

You might be surprised if you talk to an actual officer about your belief in your trespassing signs.

 

[ATM]

...It's the SAME scenario.

Obviously it isn't. If Church's put up a no trespassing sign and didn't allow the public to enter, it might be more similar.