Is that all, really? He's allowed to open his mouth.
And what of Holder? Am I understanding correctly that several INGO members want Holder to do something?
It became a Fed matter the moment Dictator Obama opened his mouth.
(Isn't it strange that he said nothing about the St. Patrick's Day shooting in Chicago where 50 were said to have been injured and 10 of those killed - including a 6 year old girl.)
It seems the tone of this thread is critical of Eric Holder for not taking action against the NBP. Usually, we see posts about how the feds are too involved. Are we just using this as an opportunity to rag on Holder?
Florida Gov. Rick Scott made a blanket statement: "We have taken steps to ensure that the investigation into the tragic death of Trayvon Martin is fair, measured and thorough. Justice is ill served when there is a rush to judgment. We are a nation of laws and we must let the legal system work. Talk of bounties and retribution has no place in this dialogue, and they compound tragedy with tragedy."
I agree with the governor's comment, but should we be critical of him for not calling out the Panthers by name? While I disagree with their message, they have the same 1A protections as the rest of us. I'm confident if the NBP are breaking laws, they will be held accountable.
I find these INGO discussions interesting and enlightening. I also see something else. IMO, dross was correct when he posted in another thread: "What this situation reveals more than most is the bias people bring to it."
I got Jack, good enough? Now to get that assbag to tweet my address
I find these INGO discussions interesting and enlightening. I also see something else. IMO, dross was correct when he posted in another thread: "What this situation reveals more than most is the bias people bring to it."
EDIT: Just reread the OP, which was specifically about Eric Holder and the double standard. My bad!
If my opinions appear biased, it's probably because they often differ from yours. I am not perfect, but prefer to deal with the whole truth when possible. If being biased toward facts is troubling, then so be it. However, I'll take your comment seriously and will attempt to be more discerning.It's OK, you're just showing the bias you brought to it.
Can we start our own non-racist club too?
The White Tigers has a nice ring to it.
Racism masquerading as a special interest is disgusting.
To quote the demagogue Malcolm X: "It is criminal to teach a man not to defend himself when he is the constant victim of brutal attacks."
Can Mr. Zimmerman put a bounty on the black panthers
no that would be considered racist by the media............
jake
wish i could have written that in purple..........