What exactly does a sponsor do?
The NRA has many functions, they are not single faceted. Safety programs, training, PR, sanctioning, Publications, Studies for hunting rights and regulations, legal assistance, insurance, range engineering, civil and criminal legislation and other things as well as political battles. It is pretty hard to be a gun owner and not benefit from NRA work.
Most people do not base their decisions on the whole picture. The NRA has the same trouble we all do. Sometimes the choice is not good and bad, it is bad and worse. Every single function is enough for me to support financially. GOA is straight political. I support them. If a person does not like a particular organization for any reason, that is alright. The important thing is that each gun owner do something. $20 bucks does not cover the battle for a year. You have to be involved all year, write letters, call congressmen, file complaints with local authorities. Sign onto class action lawsuits. Fund those on the front line doing the work you cannot do, like lawyers taking matters to the courts. Maybe you will think of something I left out.
The GOA is straight political which is what I want and support. The NRA also tends to be hunter orients as well as willing to compromise. I don't nat support the NRA and yes, they have the name recognition due to being more adept at advertising (and paying for it) to make more money. The NRA excels at raising TAXABLE donations and selling branded and marked for because of it merchandise so you can show all your friends you are doing something. GOA has a few shirts and hats and a sticker or two but spending money on junk takes away from the cause so they don't apend a lot on it either. The donations to the GA are therefore TAX DEDUCIBLE.
The NRA had lobby duties forced on them by being the only organization about guns then. They never did get all that good at it either but they do try. The GOA is only about fighting for our rights so that is what they are good at. Knowing that they thought the NFA was so obviously going to be struck down by SCOTUS that they never showed up for the trial with a Court that WOULD have done so is the first time it made me mad but I jept with them. The GOA would never have an office holder say "AR-15's have no place in civilian hands. You can't even hunt with them." If it did happen the guy would at least loose his job at the GOA. When this happened at the NRA a few years ago the guy lost his other jobs and advertising contracts but the NRA not only kept him on but spent a fair bit of money getting him re-elected to the board in his defense ads. For the record THAT was the event that made me so angry with the NRAtaht I stopped supporting them
I do think the NRA does one thing good and that is low cost loans for renovating smaller ranges and they also provide a lot of good training for firearms enthusiasts. The GOA doesn't even have that sort of thing other than court support, which the NRA also does. So I do think the NRA provides a lot of good services, I am just saying they don't do very well lobbying or even supporting good cases in the courts, They are really picky about those cases they will take and rarely take one until it will also give them a lot of free advertising in the news.
Just wanted to say all this, I know it will make no difference and the NRA will continue to make money hand over fist.
Well stated.
I tried to rep you, but I need to spread the love around first I guess.
but perhaps you repped someone else? I'm not seeing it.I got him for you.