Here is a dumb question; why are there different sights for carry vs competition? Aren't both shooting styles focusing on quick shots to a larger target than say a precision shooter?
Whoa boy, that's a can of worms.
Competition sights will get him killed in the streets!
And here's my "real answer":Here is a dumb question; why are there different sights for carry vs competition? Aren't both shooting styles focusing on quick shots to a larger target than say a precision shooter?
So those who use a fiber optic front with a black rear, do you wait until the front sight becomes visible and on target and shoot? I'm sure I can word this better, but I'm tired and my brain isn't firing on all cylinders. Hopefully you understand what I'm asking.
So those who use a fiber optic front with a black rear, do you wait until the front sight becomes visible and on target and shoot? I'm sure I can word this better, but I'm tired and my brain isn't firing on all cylinders. Hopefully you understand what I'm asking.
it works better that way than pointing the gun in the general vicinity of the target.
So those who use a fiber optic front with a black rear, do you wait until the front sight becomes visible and on target and shoot? I'm sure I can word this better, but I'm tired and my brain isn't firing on all cylinders. Hopefully you understand what I'm asking.
I knew there was a better way of ask. Here goes...
With a black rear and a fiber front, any yaw will cause the front sight to be covered by the rear. Shooting now would result in a miss. On the other hand, when the fiber is visible (and on target) you know that a shot would result in a hit, assuming your pitch is correct.
This would be opposed to actually "aiming" like I typically do with a 3 dot set up, where I line the three dots up so they are on the same horizontal plane, with equal an equal gap between the left and right of the front sight compared to the rear, and then shoot when all of that is on target.
Does that make any more sense, or make me sound like any less of an idiot?
My sight picture relies more on the "equal height, equal light" picture of the black irons - front sight is centered within the rear sight gap and the tops of both front & rear align. The fiber optic is more of a "attention-getter". Someone has posted a pretty good article on sight pictures recently, I'll see if I can find it.With a black rear and a fiber front, any yaw will cause the front sight to be covered by the rear. Shooting now would result in a miss. On the other hand, when the fiber is visible (and on target) you know that a shot would result in a hit, assuming your pitch is correct.
This would be opposed to actually "aiming" like I typically do with a 3 dot set up, where I line the three dots up so they are on the same horizontal plane, with equal an equal gap between the left and right of the front sight compared to the rear, and then shoot when all of that is on target.
Does that make any more sense, or make me sound like any less of an idiot?
Carry gun...I run factory on mine and the jury is still out for me on having night sights on a gun; I have owned several with and I think it is a great way to find your gun in the dark but I'm still debating the merits of them for a carry gun, but that is me. Many swear by them and others curse them!