University wants everyone to use 'gender inclusive' pronouns...

[HoughMade]

Deacon Jones and I believe in inclusiveness.

[video=youtube;Lm2l0pxYw-4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lm2l0pxYw-4[/video]

 

[Drail]

I reckon I could come up with some "pronouns" that would make them wet their pants.

 

[PistolBob]

I think we need to replace them all with the simple one word contraction of "y'all"

"Y'all crazy"
"Y'all are some bad drivers!"
"Y'all needs to stop stealin' stuf!"
"Y'all suck at hockey!"

that's all, y'all!

 

[Mr Evilwrench]

I've been leaning toward "this ***hole", "that ***hole", "those ***holes" and "hey ***hole".

 

[miguel]

Is "fruity pants" neutral enough?

 

[rhino]

"Douche bag" seems gender inclusive to me.

 

[actaeon277]

"Douche bag" seems gender inclusive to me.

Now where have I heard that before?

 

[rhino]

"Douche bag" seems gender inclusive to me.

Now where have I heard that before?

Sweet Enola Gay! Did I agree with you again??!!!

 

[actaeon277]

Sweet Enola Gay! Did I agree with you again??!!!

Maybe you were being sarcastic.

 

[rhino]

Maybe you were being sarcastic.

Which time? HAH! (see what I did there?)

 

[Mr Evilwrench]

Sweet Enola Gay! Did I agree with you again??!!!

That's "Enola Homosexual" now.
Reported for insensitivity and homophobia. Probably a couple other things, too.

 

[actaeon277]

Which time? HAH! (see what I did there?)

No

 

[IndyGal65]

Douche canoes. Yup. I like the pronoun douche canoes.

 

[ArmedProgrammer]

Isn't "all y'all" inclusive enough?

As in - "fine.... screw all y'all..."

on second thought, I might want to reconsider my choice of words...

 

[Bill of Rights]

I must object to the use of the term "douche" for the people raising this issue. (perhaps I could say they were raising a stink over this issue, but that would incur a rash of "I see what you did there"s.)

The term "douche" and most permutations thereof imply both usefulness and a reasonable chance of intimate proximity with a vagina, the former of which applies to none of those persons described in the first sentence of this post, while the latter is clearly inapplicable to those who also happen to be in possession of an attached penis.

Perhaps the Bob&Tom favorite of "assbag" is more fitting?

Blessings,
Bill

 

[mikeruth]

Just call all humans "it".

 

[MCgrease08]

I officiated a hockey game this weekend and one of the teams had several players who happened to be girls.

There were a couple of instances where the coach offered encouragement by shouting, "let's go boys!"

Oddly enough, there were no cries of sexism. Everyone left the rink happy, with their panties noticeably un-bunched.

 

[actaeon277]

I officiated a hockey game this weekend and one of the teams had several players who happened to be girls.

There were a couple of instances where the coach offered encouragement by shouting, "let's go boys!"

Oddly enough, there were no cries of sexism. Everyone left the rink happy, with their panties noticeably un-bunched.

They must be more grown up than these college students.

 

[BogWalker]

They must be more grown up than these college students.

As a college student I can say they probably were more grown up than many of the loons around campus.

 

[Bill of Rights]

I officiated a hockey game this weekend and one of the teams had several players who happened to be girls.

There were a couple of instances where the coach offered encouragement by shouting, "let's go boys!"

Oddly enough, there were no cries of sexism. Everyone left the rink happy, with their panties noticeably un-bunched.

The irony, it burns, but it was probably intentional.

Of course, the next question I would ask would have to be what you were doing looking at these presumably-young girls' (or boys'!) panties to notice the unbunchedness?

Tell you what, let's just leave that question in all of it's empurpled glory unanswered, shall we?

Blessings,
Bill