Now the witch hunting starts
Man follows woman into restroom after mistaking her for a man | WFAA.com
Woman mistaken for transgender harassed in Walmart bathroom - NewsTimes
School Board Allows Pepper Spray In School Suggesting Use Against Transgender Students
Ugh. I fought hard on this in the other thread but Obama sure makes it a pain. I come down on the live and let live side of things. And as long as they arn't interfering with your rights, it really dosnt matter what's between the legs of the person in the next stall over.
BUT, executive...
Thanks for the awesome reply. I feel like we really understand eachothers positions now, and we just disagree on some stuff. But I think we agree on a lot more then we disagree on.
I totally agree with you that long standing pillars of civilization should be thoroughly discussed before we...
ok I think I'm starting to understand our base disconnect here.
To start, fundamentally we agree. The Government does not have the right to redefine language. Specifically the government does not have the right to redefine marriage. Again on that topic we agree.
our separation comes from our...
Obergefell v. Hodges wasn't even about "approving" of gay marriage so i feel your continued use of the word imprimatur is not appropriate in this context. The 14th amendment argument in Obergefell v. Hodges was that the right for homosexuals to marry was inherent and inalienable. That any form...
I have to agree with you on the numbers, they were wholly irrelevant. The Supreme Court we pretty clear and the word "Marriage" was only part of the fight. But the gay marriage debate is meaningless at this point. It's over.
my only sticking point with your statement is your use of...
Of Course this whole thing has been blown out of proportion. no argument there.
but the Transsexuals didn't DO anything. The state of North Carolina did when they wrote an entire Law about it. I don't think anybody thinks Trans are a large population. And the people against this view this...
Seems like a risky and expensive gambit. Either way you are in it for millions on the Supreme Court case. If you win, YAY! But if you lose you are going to jail for a LONG time
First, there is no hate speech law I know of in the US. The Supreme Court has been very clear on that. Now hate crime enhancements ( nothing to do with free speech) were made because we have a super ****ty history with minorities in this country. Do I always agree with how they are applied? No...
I get that everyone would protect their rights if Hitler jr. took over.
But my question is more of a legal "what if"
In the state of Indiana would a general ban even apply in the case of a redefinition of the federal second amendment? With all citizens of the state being defacto members...
do you have any material on that? Is there any standing or past law inolving genders and bathrooms that could be relevant here? I was under the impression that we were wandering into new judicial and legislative territory. And that's what all this hub-ub is about.
Again nobody from the left is...
I'm sorry you seem to feel that my failing to be complicit with your cultural world view is buffoonery.
you raised the topic of logical extentions and effects of the bathroom decision. I have done nothing but respond with my opinion on topic with a main focus on how the unintended consequences...
and what about the women who unfortunately are born with manly features? do they deserve to be questioned every time they go pee?
when did the cops become the potty police?