I have always heard that the 10mm and the .40 S&W were comparable. I purchesd a Baretta Vertec in .40 S&W because I was told that the 10mm was becoming rare.
Is there any truth to this?
Full power 10mm is a great caliber and a great gun to use. I had a G20SF and it was a great gun, but the downfall is that I couldn't hunt with it in this state and I didn't need it for bear protection when hiking. Basically the 10mm is great if you can justify a use for it, otherwise it's just a very expensive way to shoot targets.
After a lot of ammo and good times I ended up selling my G20SF and went back to 9mm's when I saw that factory ammo back at $10 per 50 and under. I don't have the time to spend reloading pistol rounds that shoot less than 100 yards when I can get factory ammo that works just fine at that cheaper price point.
There is a school of thought (I attend some times) that the 10mm is an ideal keep-in-the-car-gun. If you ever have to do armed battle between (or with) a car a big heavy bonded 10mm bullet has some positive features.
I'm more likely to face an angry Honda than I am an angry Kodiak.
Many valid points made in this thread and I do agree with most. I normally carry concealed but when hiking and hunting id like to have something dependable and powerful. I've looked at the g20sf a lot and love the capacity and style, bit I havent held one yet. If I can make it to indy I will definitely be in contact for some range time.
I also was looking at the eaa witness. I'm a 1911 fan. Anyone have anything to say for those?