10th Amendment RESOLUTIONS POST Here

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • WHAT HAPPENED

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 14, 2009
    487
    16
    Largo, FL
    UPDATE: 03/11/10 for Wyoming!!!!!! WOOOTTTT

    BETTER MAP AND UP TO DATE <<---- CLICK HERE

    Wyoming Governor Signs Sovereignty Resolution|Tenth Amendment Center<<---- CLICK HERE
    The Senate passed it by a vote of 26-4 and the House by a vote of 56-4.


    Georgia HR 280 (Senate Version - Passed 43-1 on 04/01/09)

    HM 19 House / Senate SM 96 Florida Now in Economic Development & Community Affairs Policy Council Thursday, October 01, 2009 11:24 AM

    Indiana Senate Passes SR42 Claiming Sovereignty under the 10th Amendment|Tenth Amendment Center

    Arkansas HCR 1011 (failed in committee on 03-04-09 passed committee 04-01-09 failed House vote, 54-34)

    Arizona HCR 2024

    Hawaiian Constitutional Convention, Hawaii Con-Con, Updated: 26 Feb 2009

    Montana (Failed 51-49 on 02-24-09) (Resolution reintroduced as HR3) (HR3 Passed House Committee on 04-21-09) (HR3 failed to pass in house, 50-50)

    Michigan (senate version introduced 03-03-09)

    Missouri House of Representatives

    NEW HAMPSHIRE HCR 0006 (resolution killed in house on 03-04-09: 216-150)

    Washington State HJM 4009 - 2009-10

    Tennessee

    Texas Legislature Online - 81(R) History for HCR 50

    Oklahoma House passed HJR1003 (passed house on 02/18/09, senate version passed 25-17 on 03-04-09)

    Ohio H. C. R. No. 11

    Nevada AJR15

    Oregon LC 1659

    Alabama HJR298

    Mississippi HC 69

    Idaho (Passed House 51-17, on 03-23-09.)

    NEW MEXICO HJR27

    South Dakota (passed house on 03-03-09 by a vote of 51-18, passed senate on 03-05-09 by a vote of 20-14)

    Virginia HR 61

    Alaska HR 9 The House passed the resolution by a vote of 37-0 (3 not voting) and the Senate passed it by a vote of 40-0.

    Minnesota H.F. No. 997

    South Carolina Bill 3509 (passed house on 02-26-09, senate - referred to subcommittee)

    2009 Senate Concurrent Resolution 1609 (Oppose federal government legislative mandates) - Kansas Votes

    Iowa SCR1

    Kentucky



    YouTube - Rohrer: Pennsylvania 10th Amendment Clearly Defines State Powers
    PA State Rep. Samuel Rohrer - Page Not Found
    The Pennsylvania General Assembly


    source: State Sovereignty Movement Quietly Growing

    As things stand right now it looks like Oklahoma, Washington, Hawaii, Missouri, Arizona, New Hampshire, Georgia, California, Michigan and Montana will all definitely consider sovereignty bills this year. They may be joined by Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Alaska, Kansas, Alabama, Nevada, Maine and Pennsylvania where legislators have pledged to introduce similar bills. Twenty states standing up to the federal government and demanding a return to constitutional principles is a great start, but it remains to be seen whether legislatures and governors are brave enough or angry enough to follow through. As the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress push for more expansion of federal power and spending that may help provide the motivation needed for the sovereignty movement to take off.
     
    Last edited:

    melensdad

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 94.7%
    18   1   0
    Apr 2, 2008
    24,088
    77
    Far West Suburban Lowellabama
    do you guys/gals want this to be updated?
    Yes, I'd like to know which states introduce this type of resolution, AND then I'd like to know which states actually pass these resolutions.

    BUT THEN it would also be interesting to see if any state actually does a damn thing by following up on enforcing the resolutions after they are passed. I have a feeling that these are just political ploys, used to show that the states still have their balls, but in reality I think many are just false bravado and will not yield any reduction in Federal authority of these states.
     

    WHAT HAPPENED

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 14, 2009
    487
    16
    Largo, FL
    finding more info to update :D

    STATE OF OKLAHOMA

    1st Session of the 52nd Legislature (2009)

    HOUSE JOINT
    RESOLUTION 1003 By: Key





    AS INTRODUCED

    <StartFT>A Joint Resolution claiming sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over certain powers; serving notice to the federal government to cease and desist certain mandates; providing that certain federal legislation be prohibited or repealed; and directing distribution.<EndFT>




    WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States reads as follows:
    "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."; and
    WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment defines the total scope of federal power as being that specifically granted by the Constitution of the United States and no more; and
    WHEREAS, the scope of power defined by the Tenth Amendment means that the federal government was created by the states specifically to be an agent of the states; and
    WHEREAS, today, in 2009, the states are demonstrably treated as agents of the federal government; and
    WHEREAS, many federal laws are directly in violation of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; and
    WHEREAS, the Tenth Amendment assures that we, the people of the United States of America and each sovereign state in the Union of States, now have, and have always had, rights the federal government may not usurp; and
    WHEREAS, Article IV, Section 4 says, “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government”, and the Ninth Amendment states that ”The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people”; and
    WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has ruled in New York v. United States, 112 S. Ct. 2408 (1992), that Congress may not simply commandeer the legislative and regulatory processes of the states; and
    WHEREAS, a number of proposals from previous administrations and some now pending from the present administration and from Congress may further violate the Constitution of the United States.
    NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND THE SENATE OF THE 1ST SESSION OF THE 52ND OKLAHOMA LEGISLATURE:
    THAT the State of Oklahoma hereby claims sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the Constitution of the United States.
    THAT this serve as Notice and Demand to the federal government, as our agent, to cease and desist, effective immediately, mandates that are beyond the scope of these constitutionally delegated powers.
    THAT all compulsory federal legislation which directs states to comply under threat of civil or criminal penalties or sanctions or requires states to pass legislation or lose federal funding be prohibited or repealed.
    THAT a copy of this resolution be distributed to the President of the United States, the President of the United States Senate, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate of each state's legislature of the United States of America, and each member of the Oklahoma Congressional Delegation.

    52-1-5082 <SD> <11/17/08>
     
    Last edited:

    SavageEagle

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 27, 2008
    19,568
    38
    Ok. So the states are debating this and some have passed it (If I understand that right).

    Now the problem is how do we put tooth to nail here? How can the states enforce this without resorting to arms?
     

    The Meach

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Feb 23, 2009
    1,093
    38
    Nobletucky
    Ok. So the states are debating this and some have passed it (If I understand that right).

    Now the problem is how do we put tooth to nail here? How can the states enforce this without resorting to arms?

    They are putting the ball in the federal gov'ts court. Oklahoma's language is light. It kinda leaves that "or else..." feel. I know that a few states have a clause that states that Failure to Comply renders the US Constitution Null in void in the eyes of that state.
     

    gunrunner0320

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 18, 2009
    77
    6
    Anderson
    i would like to know when indiana votes on it i have been trying to follow it but all i see on there web site is in full house 1st reading ?
     

    flagtag

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 27, 2008
    3,330
    38
    Westville, IL
    Well, I'm quite sure that you will NOT see Illinois doing something like this unless the SCOTUS rules against Chicago in regards to the Second Amendment. Then, Mayor Dailey will have his puppets introduce such a bill and vote for it.
     
    Top Bottom