When falling over, instinct pretty much forces you to push your hands out to protect your face. Hell.Pitiful attempt at making your points there, Kirk. Nonsensical, in fact.
As reported, this failure wouldn't be even remotely predicated on a belief that the rifle was unloaded (as he was responding to a possible intruder) or trying to be "cool".
He didn't manage to keep it pointed in a safe direction or his finger off the trigger it seems. Those are the #1 and #2 priorities.
Either would have saved his cousin when he tripped.
Fail.
When falling over, instinct pretty much forces you to push your hands out to protect your face. Hell.
If instinctively protecting your face when you fall over ends with you unintentionally shooting someone who didn't need shot, you failed at safe gun handling. Hell.
Sure people ought to do differently, but even the best trained soldiers make mistake.
There is absolutely no reason why a rifle needs to have a round in the chamber in a church building.
There is absolutely no reason why a rifle needs to have a round in the chamber in a church building.
So then, what point were you attempting to make? Whether we call it a failure or a mistake, the person who shot his cousin when he tripped with a rifle was doing it wrong.
No doubt, just saying I feel for the kid because it could have happened to anyone in that situation.
In certain situations it would be prudent to have a loaded/chambered rifle in a church building.
Not if he had his finger in a better place.
Because every rifle is drop safe.
There was a lady at my moms church that made the best fried chicken ever....I’ve been to a few of their pitch in dinners where, if I’d had a rifle, I might have gotten more of the chicken.There is absolutely no reason why a rifle needs to have a round in the chamber in a church building.