2016 Presidential debate debate

[miguel]

Government should have never been allowed to raid Social Security. Hum.. Who's ideal was that??

Falla's!

 

[2A_Tom]

I think Chris Wallace did a decent job, he didn't throw softballs to either.

 

[Tombs]

Anyone else pleasantly surprised by Chris Wallace's moderation? That was the most neutral thus far.

I think if you're a conservative and don't like the idea of never ending middle eastern intervention, Trump nailed it.

If you're a democrat who lacks the ability to think past emotional appeals, hillary won it.

If I just watched this debate, I would not be able to tell you where hillary even stands, but I could most certainly tell you where Trump stands.

 

[miguel]

When she brought up Russia, he should have asked her why she was in on selling them our uranium.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/u...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

 

[Mgderf]

I think Trump did better then she did.

Well, that's what YOU think, and myself as well.
I'll bet most on this forum believe he did well.

We'll see.
His "refusal to accept results" comment is evidently stirring up the libs.
Sounded tongue-in-cheek to me, but they won't spin it that way.

 

[long coat]

Here is a pic of the light.

 

[KittySlayer]

His "refusal to accept results" comment is evidently stirring up the libs.
Sounded tongue-in-cheek to me, but they won't spin it that way.

Gore didn't accept the results in 2000. Had to be decided by SCOTUS.

 

[aaron580]

She is weak... and seriously, nit picking on not accepting the results? Has a democrat ever accepted a result? I think not.... that dude on fox news just got his arse raped in his argument.

Oops, I'm racist now.

 

[Jeff]

She is weak... and seriously, nit picking on not accepting the results? Has a democrat ever accepted a result?

Secretary Clinton will.

 

[Sylvain]

 

[aaron580]

Secretary Clinton will.

Ding ding, we have a f***ING winner! Billary can't come up with a real argument other than socialism and right taking, can't come up with any credible source against the leaks, and says nothing other than the oponent won't accept the outcome? Pathetic. It's Obama all over again. Lower and raise taxes, socialized med and school, guns are bad, my oponent isn't nice (takes one to know one). Pathetic what we are down to. Russia looks at us aND laughs as they sail right through the English channel and carpet bomb sirya with more heavy bumbers at one time than we can muster in days.

 

[Mgderf]

Gore didn't accept the results in 2000. Had to be decided by SCOTUS.

I was not condemning him for not committing today.
I was pointing out that HE was emphasizing his accusations of voter fraud, and campaign corruption.

Hillary has no leg to stand on when you start speaking of corruption, or ethics, or morals, or...

 

[Tombs]

Well, that's what YOU think, and myself as well.
I'll bet most on this forum believe he did well.

We'll see.
His "refusal to accept results" comment is evidently stirring up the libs.
Sounded tongue-in-cheek to me, but they won't spin it that way.

As far as accepting the results, anyone remember 2000?

There's evidence of DNC staffers admitting to rigging the election and if they aren't in jail before the election, I would contest it as well. The justice department should not tolerate people doing such a thing and causing such public discontent and destruction of faith in our election system by allowing these criminals to continue to do the job the DNC has ordered them to do.

If anything, it simply makes the whole government look awful and corrupt.

Also if you think Frank Luntz is biased, here's the first debate: http://i.imgur.com/jUEYlrj.png

 

[Sylvain]

I think they both did ok, none of them did great or poorly.
Trump was better than last time.
He was quite weak on the second amendment though, when Clinton mentioned the "online and gunshow loopholes" (again! She did it last time too), he sould have asked what they were since they don't exist (as far as I'm aware).

The moderators were certainly less biased that during the last debate.
Fair to both Clinton and Trump.

I don't think much people changed their opinion after tonight.

Not that anyone cares but it was my take on the debate.

 

[bwframe]

.

I'd like to see Megyn Kelly's face when she sees this. She hates Trump about as much as GP does.

 

[Mgderf]

I'd like to see Megyn Kelly's face when she sees this. She hates Trump about as much as GP does.

I have to agree. Megyn Kelly seems to be letting her bias become more and more of her on-air persona.
Sad to see.

 

[Dirtebiker]

Protect the toddlers?

Toddlers injure themselves and kill people with guns!

Dozens of toddlers. But kill millions of BABIES? That's a woman's right to health care!?

 

[7mmMagnus]

When she brought up Russia, he should have asked her why she was in on selling them our uranium.

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal - The New York Times

I was thinking the same thing. I think I said it out loud to the t.v.. She claims Trump is buddy buddy with rootin tootin Putin but I do believe she was responsible for the "reset".

 

[bwframe]

Anyone order any magazines or ammo during the debate?

 

[Tombs]

Protect the toddlers?

Toddlers injure themselves and kill people with guns!

Funny how she's okay with killing children that are halfway out of their mother's body, but she find fault with gun owners because some people are careless enough to allow their children to access their firearms.

Anyone order any magazines or ammo during the debate?

I took care of that about a year ago.