Kirk Freeman
Grandmaster
If I post something pointing out what I believe to qualify as tyranny, he will cite the statutes that make it a legally accepted practice.
Yes, the use of precedent is so novel in the law.
The spirit and the intent of the 4th amendment are being violated by nonsense like this. Quoting statutes and case law does not serve to refute that.
Consensual searchs are not unreasonable. I would post the precedent but it would be ignored here.
So, I cite the fact that even L. Neil Smith would admit that consensual searches are reasonable.
Kirk is definitely pro-state, but as best I can tell he is arguing that if a person voluntarily allows the police to search through his stuff, and the police find something, there are no constitutional issues.
I'm not pro-State. I fight the government each and every day. However, if you let them search your vehicle then what exactly is the constitutional issue?
The beef has been stated, but you have such a wildly pro-state position on this that you think the Feds can set up checkpoints on any form of public property and start checking papers and cargo.
No, it hasn't. You seem to think that the presence of cops equates to an irrebuttable presumption of constitutional violations. It does not.
Don't play the cops' game. Stop allowing them to search. Carry your own pack and don't use public lands to go shooting.
oh, also in before Kirk's repeated "You do not have the right to be a litterbug" strawman
Right, because one should respect property rights.
Most folks don't have the balls to tell "authority" shove off your can't tell me to do that,
Yup.
People think they live in some special rainbow and puppy dog dome, let's call it an American Zone, where the authorities are not even allowed to ask questions.
Be a citizen, don't play their games.