600 Round Assault Clip

[Pitbullguy81]

Haven't seen this on here so I thought I would share it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W66TPHy5lJw

 

[PapaScout]

Ok, that was kinda fun

 

[SERparacord]

I blame the No Child Left Behind Act.

 

[Fishersjohn48]

Fake and Gay.....

Never fired more than 18 rounds without a break in the video.

 

[armedindy]

Fake and Gay.....

Never fired more than 18 rounds without a break in the video.

This, who would want to waste all their glock mags like that anyways

 

[Chewie]

He didn't waste anything, just taped them together. 2 cameras used from 2 angles recording the shooting of 1 clip. Then alternate each one over and over.
If all thoses clips were really loaded there is no way they would have stayed that straight while shhoting.

Questions...do you really have to hold your junk when you shoot?
Does it help accuracy?
Does he squeeze his junk each time he pulls the trigger?

What a bunch of BS.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

The video was made for humor, not to be scrutinized so deeply.

 

[MikeDVB]

I saw that the other day... Got a small chuckle out of me when I thought about an anti watching that and thinking it was real [as most of them have no understanding what-so-ever how a semi-automatic firearm works.]

 

[armedindy]

He didn't waste anything, just taped them together. 2 cameras used from 2 angles recording the shooting of 1 clip. Then alternate each one over and over.
If all thoses clips were really loaded there is no way they would have stayed that straight while shhoting.

Questions...do you really have to hold your junk when you shoot?
Does it help accuracy?
Does he squeeze his junk each time he pulls the trigger?

What a bunch of BS.

I know, that was my point....he didnt waste any of them, because that would be stupid. but so is the videop

 

[CathyInBlue]

I blame the No Child Left Behind Act.

I blame lunar tidal effects.

He didn't waste anything, just taped them together. 2 cameras used from 2 angles recording the shooting of 1 clip. Then alternate each one over and over.

One camera. Set up. Shoot one mag. Move camera. Load full mag. Set up. Shoot second mag.

If you'll notice, the position of the one camera is in the other camera's field of view, and vice versa. This couldn't have been done with two cams without digitally deleting the camera in each camera's field of view.

 

[Chewie]

I'm a mechanical engineer by training, couldn't help myself.
Whith the current state of anti-gunners around I'm sure they would love this to try for more stupid, inane laws.
If the climate were different I would probably have laughed at this but I am a little to paranoid about the current US Gov't.
Just me and just sayin.

 

[OZZY.40]

He didn't waste anything, just taped them together. 2 cameras used from 2 angles recording the shooting of 1 clip. Then alternate each one over and over.
If all thoses clips were really loaded there is no way they would have stayed that straight while shhoting.

Questions...do you really have to hold your junk when you shoot?
Does it help accuracy?
Does he squeeze his junk each time he pulls the trigger?

What a bunch of BS.

Yes, holding your junk helps accuracy, but you have to squeeze the trigger and pull your junk; it won't work if you have the process backwards.

 

[MikeDVB]

Yes, holding your junk helps accuracy, but you have to squeeze the trigger and pull your junk; it won't work if you have the process backwards.

You mean if you pull the trigger and squeeze your junk the firearm will not function? I think, perhaps, such a firearm should be inspected for damage.

 

[CathyInBlue]

I'm a mechanical engineer by training, couldn't help myself.

I could see someone fabbing an actual 600 round mag from sheet stock, with a brake and welder, and then using a pneumaticly sealed follower and a QD coupler on the baseplate to use air pressure in lieu of metal spring. The catch will be pressure regulation. Let the pressure flag, the next round won't present fast enough to be chambered. Let the pressure spike, it might not even let the Glock cycle, or even blow out the gun without even firing a round.

 

[MikeDVB]

I could see someone fabbing an actual 600 round mag from sheet stock, with a brake and welder, and then using a pneumaticly sealed follower and a QD coupler on the baseplate to use air pressure in lieu of metal spring. The catch will be pressure regulation. Let the pressure flag, the next round won't present fast enough to be chambered. Let the pressure spike, it might not even let the Glock cycle, or even blow out the gun without even firing a round.

Careful - they're going to ban air compressors and air hose...

 

[OZZY.40]

You mean if you pull the trigger and squeeze your junk the firearm will not function? I think, perhaps, such a firearm should be inspected for damage.

It will function, but it may not hold a sub MOA accuracy like it will with proper technique.

 

[CathyInBlue]

Careful - they're going to ban air compressors and air hose...

Then what would D.C. do for its hot air supply?

 

[MikeDVB]

It will function, but it may not hold a sub MOA accuracy like it will with proper technique.

Ah... I would think the sheer length and weight of the 'clip' would affect sub-MOA more so than the trigger pull in this case .

 

[MikeDVB]

Then what would D.C. do for its hot air supply?

We all know they don't need mechanical air compressors to produce high volumes of hot air.

 

[Chewie]

Yes, holding your junk helps accuracy, but you have to squeeze the trigger and pull your junk; it won't work if you have the process backwards.

Now I understand, I was really confused for a minute. Thanks for the technical update!