Comparing calibers is splitting hairs. Shooting in self defense is just like real estate - location, location, location.
Taurus is introducing the "Supreme Judge" in 20mm this spring.
Here we go again.
if it's a weapon you plan to put your life on, then you need to be procient with it. That means you're going to need to practice a LOT to first, get proficient, then maintain it. It's much more affordable to pay for 9mm than .45
The 40 I've shot was a bit snappy for me even more so than a 4in 357 revolver.
Just a few items:Personal preference is a key factor.
- There is no such thing as "stopping power" in handguns. It is a myth. Additionally, handguns are inherently poor manstoppers from a physiological perspective.
- Bullet terminal performance and shop placement are independent. Bullet performance is a technology issue; while shot placement is a training issue. Neither affects the other.
- When all things are considered--wound profiles, muzzle blast, recoil, follow-up shot speed, magazine capacity, ammunition cost--there isn't a hair's difference among the 9, .40, and .45, assuming top-performing ammunition meeting all FBI terminal ballistic protocols.
I'll pay the extra money for the 45 acp ammo I shoot my 1911 more consistently shooting a 2 inch spread at 25 yards using the fancy 15 round clip just as fast as I can pull that trigger. 45 period point blank. It's like getting ran over if you were tryin to run over somebody would you use a prius or a semi? Seems pretty simple 45 for the win its tested and tried. The 9 failed in law enforcement that's why most cops carry a larger caliber.
The phrase "stop or I'll shoot" is a pretty good manstopper