Found this in my inbox today. Federal has modified their Hydra-Shok bullet in .380 Auto and 38 Special +P to have better penetration over the old design.
Hydra-Shok Deep
Hydra-Shok Deep
Penetration was never the problem with old school HS. Reliable expansion was. They had the tendency to not peel back significantly in lower velocity cartridges, including .45 Auto, in many situations.
Wad cuttersI think I'm done buying anything with the Federal name on it, for the present anyway. I don't care for their new offerings at a time when I believe their concentration should be getting reasonable priced and volume of ammo/components to their customers.
When I run out of 147gr HST's, what would be your recommendation for an alternative brand of self defense ammo?
.
I think I'm done buying anything with the Federal name on it, for the present anyway. I don't care for their new offerings at a time when I believe their concentration should be getting reasonable priced and volume of ammo/components to their customers.
When I run out of 147gr HST's, what would be your recommendation for an alternative brand of self defense ammo?
.
^^^
Speer and Federal are owned by the same company . . .
If you want to stick with 147gr, Gold Dots are a very solid competitor and frankly I'd have a tough time arguing against them as a first choice for anyone, although I'd be comfortable with many others. The most current offering is the G2, although older Gold Dots are still a good option as well. G2s compared to older single cannelure HSTs *tend* to penetrate a bit more and expand a bit less, and *tend* to do better in auto glass testing, which correlates well with bone strikes. I'd have no concerns carrying either generation of Gold Dot but would lean toward G2s if available. Speer quality control has historically been very good as well.
Winchester's Ranger lineup is a strong competitor as well. Note there is a bonded and a non-bonded option. Bonded is just sold as Ranger Bonded. It passes the entirety of the FBI testing protocol, and is pretty neck-and-neck with G2 in terms of penetration and expansion. Either can edge the other depending on which test, but you're down to hair splitting at that point (perhaps literal, depending on shot placement!). Ranger-T is the non-bonded, and it expands more but penetrates less. I don't know if it passed the FBI protocols or not.
If you're not married to 147gr and don't mind +P, there are more options but there's a lot of good choices on the market now for 9mm.
Thank you! Knew you'd have solid advise on this.
Years back, when I settled on 147gr HST's, +P in that Federal loading tested very similar in performance to the standard loading. The only thing added by +P on 147Gr Federal HST's was recoil, (and the "more powerful" +P advertising.) You are saying that other brand's loadings in 147gr might not necessarily be similar to this? Gold Dots for example?
I'm not opposed to trying lighter bullets, but have always shot 147's. I was under the impression that heavy for caliber was the way to go in 9mm self defense? That has always dovetailed with building ammo for practice/competition in 147gr that were soft and fast shooting. My practice and SD loads have been hard to tell the difference in recoil and accuracy.