Another pathetic NPR poll

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • hoosierdoc

    Freed prisoner
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Apr 27, 2011
    25,987
    149
    Galt's Gulch
    NPR: 8-point swing puts Romney in front | WashingtonExaminer.com

    So... they interviewed 1000 people nationwide, or 20 per state :dunno:

    They polled heavier in 12 "battleground" states and hit 462 people there. So they interviewed 38.5 in each state and they feel confident in their numbers? They said a 3% margin of error, yet each respondent in a battleground state represented almost 3% of the response in each state.

    I fail to see how this poll is worth anything, but it did show Romney ahead and up 8 points from a month ago
     

    Willie

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Nov 24, 2010
    2,682
    48
    Warrick County
    "What's more, those polled said that Obama, by a 55 percent to 44 percent margin, has spelled out a clear agenda for the nation." - shows how skewed it is......
     

    neraph

    Plinker
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Oct 7, 2009
    91
    6
    NPR: 8-point swing puts Romney in front | WashingtonExaminer.com

    So... they interviewed 1000 people nationwide, or 20 per state :dunno:

    They polled heavier in 12 "battleground" states and hit 462 people there. So they interviewed 38.5 in each state and they feel confident in their numbers? They said a 3% margin of error, yet each respondent in a battleground state represented almost 3% of the response in each state.

    I fail to see how this poll is worth anything, but it did show Romney ahead and up 8 points from a month ago

    Yes, a sample size of 1000 will have a approximately 3% margin of error for a 95% confidence interval. Which is to say, if they conducted this poll 20 times, 19 out of 20 times the results would be within 3% of each other.

    Sample sizes for most polls fall between 1000 and 3000.

    Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margin_of_error
    and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_sampling

    Yes, statistics are hard.
     

    hoosierdoc

    Freed prisoner
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Apr 27, 2011
    25,987
    149
    Galt's Gulch
    Yes, a sample size of 1000 will have a approximately 3% margin of error for a 95% confidence interval. Which is to say, if they conducted this poll 20 times, 19 out of 20 times the results would be within 3% of each other.

    Sample sizes for most polls fall between 1000 and 3000.

    Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margin_of_error
    and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_sampling

    Yes, statistics are hard.

    BUT... you're looking at the entire poll +/- 3% but they are still claiming that margin on their smaller sample size of 462 for the battleground states. Really it is a whole bunch of little polls all combined into a meta-poll, right?
     
    Last edited:
    Top Bottom