Those nags aren't investigative journalists. She tries to sound so conspiracy, I know.
-But they really do have the right to do what they want.
Not quite. Media does not have the right to directly interfere with an operation, and they do not have the right to trespass on private property. A properly trained reporter knows this. The hacks and wannabes (90% of them out there) don't know or don't care.
And you're suggesting that police ought to use force to remove people from private property even if the owner doesn't complain?
How do you explain him stopping the harassment when he thought the woman would call his boss?
10% cause 90% of the problems.
If you don't have anything better to do than this, examine your life.
10% cause 90% of the problems.
If you don't have anything better to do than this, examine your life.
Too bad I screwed up the quote, it's supposed to be "Lighten up, Francis."
Too bad I screwed up the quote, it's supposed to be "Lighten up, Francis."
Oh well, just another reason to watch it again.
WTF? This is an example of police intimidation?
It's obvious this women has an agenda, with a screen name. Nevermind she went looking for trouble.
The Officer was quite professional, IMO.
Why the heck do I need to see sick BP workers? She felt bullied? Backed up? Well she put HERSELF into that situation.
This is a poor example, and the lady sounds like a liberal freak, who set the situation up, and then played victim.
Ahh. So since you don't agree with her, her freedom of the press goes out the window. I understand now.