Another reason why Glenn Beck is a retard...

[9lock]

Anyone who believes that the Twin Towers were brought down by a controlled demolition is a complete MORON. I saw the planes fly into the buildings. Shame on you for buying into that crap.

Wow you were there! that must have been a site to see, what made the south tower fall first when the north tower was hit first.

 

[WHAT HAPPENED]

Wow you were there! that must have been a site to see, what made the south tower fall first when the north tower was hit first.

x2

 

[9lock]

No seriously, there was some things in plain sight noboby talked about.

 

[slackerisme]

Glenn Beck Hits 2010 Ratings LOW

Eric Boehlert: Glenn Beck Has Lost 1/3 of Its TV Audience Since January

Most people are waking up hope you join us....

The huffington post...really??? Hate whoever you want bud. I would not tell tell many people that Jones is your messiah however, at least not those whom you wish to be taken seriously.

 

[WHAT HAPPENED]

The huffington post...really??? Hate whoever you want bud. I would not tell tell many people that Jones is your messiah however, at least not those whom you wish to be taken seriously.

What lies has Alex Jones said???? or has told?????

 

[Bigum1969]

If you believe that 9/11 was an inside job than you are .

Plain and simple.

 

[Bigum1969]

In fact, it scares the crap out of me that people would actually think 9/11 was an inside job.

Thank goodness delusional nuts that think this are completely marginalized... as it should be.

 

[slackerisme]

What lies has Alex Jones said???? or has told?????

I am the wrong one to ask, I won't listen to him. Where did I say he is a liar? I think he's a phsyco...but I don't know if he's liar.

 

[rhino]

A Partial List of Things I Just Don't Understand

• The level of hatred some express for Glenn Beck (except for the psuedo-liberal, socialist-statists who have every reason to hate him, of course)
• Why people actually believe that 9/11 was an "inside job" (e.g. the "controlled demolition" fantasy) by the government
• The lengths to which people will go to bolster their resolve over their choice to believe that 9/11 was some kind of inside job by the government
• That the same people who believe the nonsense that the 9/11 events "couldn't possibly happen" the way they've been explained (and did happen) somehow see through the anthropogenic global warming hoax
• That people don't step back and really think about choosing to believe the same nonsense that Rosie O'Donnell and Charlie Sheen believe

Occam's Razor. Google it.

 

[WHAT HAPPENED]

A Partial List of Things I Just Don't Understand

• The level of hatred some express for Glenn Beck (except for the psuedo-liberal, socialist-statists who have every reason to hate him, of course)
• Why people actually believe that 9/11 was an "inside job" (e.g. the "controlled demolition" fantasy) by the government
• The lengths to which people will go to bolster their resolve over their choice to believe that 9/11 was some kind of inside job by the government
• That the same people who believe the nonsense that the 9/11 events "couldn't possibly happen" the way they've been explained (and did happen) somehow see through the anthropogenic global warming hoax
• That people don't step back and really think about choosing to believe the same nonsense that Rosie O'Donnell and Charlie Sheen believe

Occam's Razor. Google it.

About your Occam's Razor.....

According to wikipedia “Occam's razor (sometimes spelled Ockham's razor) is a principle attributed to the 14th-century English logician and Franciscan friar William of Ockham. The principle states that the explanation of any phenomenon should make as few assumptions as possible, eliminating those that make no difference in the observable predictions of the explanatory hypothesis or theory……This is often paraphrased as "All things being equal, the simplest solution tends to be the right one," or alternately, "we should not assert that for which we do not have some proof." In other words, when multiple competing theories are equal in other respects, the principle recommends selecting the theory that introduces the fewest assumptions and postulates the fewest entities……Thus, if two theories are equally accurate and neither appears more probable than the other, the simple one is to be preferred over the complicated one, because simplicity is practical.”
This theory is often used by 9-11 “Debunkers” as the be all and end all of arguments to support their case. Usually postulating that a government plot to attack and kill it’s own people is so impossible and complicated that it couldn’t possibly be true. However, “Resorting to the importance of Occam's Razor within the limits of inductive arguments still leaves open problems of formulation; "the simplest explanation tends to be the best" is a hardly formally precise statement and cannot be used, as is, to rigorously compare two competing hypotheses.” and “Albert Einstein probably had this in mind when he wrote in 1933 that "The supreme goal of all theory is to make the irreducible basic elements as simple and as few as possible without having to surrender the adequate representation of a single datum of experience" often paraphrased as "Theories should be as simple as possible, but no simpler." It often happens that the best explanation is much more complicated than the simplest possible explanation because its postulations amount to less of an improbability. Thus the popular rephrasing of the razor - that "the simplest explanation is the best one" - fails to capture the gist of the reason behind it, in that it conflates a rigorous notion of simplicity and ease of human comprehension. The two are obviously correlated, but hardly equivalent.”
So keeping this in mind, let’s reduce the elements of some 9-11 Truth theories and try to apply Occam’s Razor, assuming two theories (Official theory and 9-11 Truth theory) are equally possible. Try to imagine you’re in school 10 plus years ago, and each scenario is completely hypothetical, unrelated and new to you. Pretend your teacher is posing these questions in a multiple choice pop-quiz. Let’s start with the most observable element of 9-11, the buildings’ collapse.

1. 3 steel and concrete skyscrapers collapse at freefall speed, almost perfectly symmetrical, into their own footprints.

A) Airplane impact + Fire destroys 2 buildings (first time in history), Fire alone destroys the third building (also first time in history).

B) Pre-planted demolitions take out the buildings floor by floor.

2. 19 hijackers on the terrorist watch lists enter the U.S.A. , are flagged as terrorists, allowed entry regardless (customs agent being told they were part of a training exercise), get drivers licenses (listing their address as an army base) and flight training in the U.S.

A) Through “cock-ups”, lack of communication between departments and ignored intelligence + memos, they somehow slipped through the cracks.

B) They were knowingly allowed into the country.

3. The Pentagon is struck by something. 80-odd cameras are pointing at it. All video except 4 frames from 1 camera is confiscated and never shown to the public for more than 6 years.

A) Nothing of interest on the tapes.

B) Something to hide on the tapes.


4. Norman Mineta testified before Congress that VP Dick Cheney ordered a stand-down for intercepting the flight heading to the Pentagon.

A) He was hoping the hijacked plane would un-hijack itself.

B) He wanted the attack to succeed.

5. The FBI, who is normally responsible for investigating federal crimes and indicting those believed to be responsible for said crimes, do not accuse or indict Osama bin Laden for the 9-11 attacks.

A) They have evidence he was responsible for 9-11

B) They have NO evidence he was responsible for 9-11


Ok I could go on but let’s stop here. This is the method where Occam’s Razor is applicable, not the overall master-plan. Otherwise, to say that “criminal elements that have infiltrated the government carried out an attack against their own people to further their global agenda” is too complicated to be possible, is like saying “The Universe revolves around the Earth because anything else is too complicated”. This is where the Razor fails logic. If you answered B to ONE of these questions then we need a new investigation into the events surrounding 9-11. If you didn’t, put on the “Dunce” cap and go sit in the corner.

 

[rhino]

Dude, if it makes you feel better to believe what you believe, do what you need to do.

 

[Bigum1969]

Again.

 

[Atropine]

A Partial List of Things I Just Don't Understand

• The level of hatred some express for Glenn Beck (except for the psuedo-liberal, socialist-statists who have every reason to hate him, of course)
• Why people actually believe that 9/11 was an "inside job" (e.g. the "controlled demolition" fantasy) by the government
• The lengths to which people will go to bolster their resolve over their choice to believe that 9/11 was some kind of inside job by the government
• That the same people who believe the nonsense that the 9/11 events "couldn't possibly happen" the way they've been explained (and did happen) somehow see through the anthropogenic global warming hoax
• That people don't step back and really think about choosing to believe the same nonsense that Rosie O'Donnell and Charlie Sheen believe

Occam's Razor. Google it.

Same reason some people believe JFK assassination was an inside job, I suppose

False flag - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The fact is, operations like this have taken place in history. Not saying 9/11 or JFK was one of them, obviously.

- Gulf of Tonkin
- Downing Street Memo
- Operation Ajax (installing the Shaw in power in Iran)

 

[HICKMAN]

I will continue to like Hannity, Coulter, Beck, O'Reilly and all of the rest of them who drive the Left absolutely nuts...

 

[buffalo-springfield40]

wow..lol...9/11 truthers....well heres my take on this subject....can a president,or a goverment plan and succeed to take down 2 of the tallest building in the world...kill 3000 ppl....which would take yrs of planning..and hundreds of ppl to pull it off?...and for everyone to not reveal the plan....ever!..Prez Clinton and Monica couldn't even perfom a sex act on each other in the privecy of the oval office without the whole world knowing it!!!!guess i'll let you figure this one out...my guess is the Hitler dude will take my quote..and add a few very clever but short statements after it...lets see shall we.

 

[Atropine]

wow..lol...9/11 truthers....well heres my take on this subject....can a president,or a goverment plan and succeed to take down 2 of the tallest building in the world...kill 3000 ppl....which would take yrs of planning..and hundreds of ppl to pull it off?...and for everyone to not reveal the plan....ever!..Prez Clinton and Monica couldn't even perfom a sex act on each other in the privecy of the oval office without the whole world knowing it!!!!guess i'll let you figure this one out...my guess is the Hitler dude will take my quote..and add a few very clever but short statements after it...lets see shall we.

Would you come out in public and admit that you helped carry out the largest terrorist attack in United States history? Just saying..

IBTL. Most people's minds are made up one way or the other on the issue -- no one is changing anyone's mind on a forum.

 

[buffalo-springfield40]

Would you come out in public and admit that you helped carry out the largest terrorist attack in United States history?

btw IBTL. Most people's minds are made up one way or the other on the issue -- no one is changing anyone's mind on a forum.

think yer missing the point....would anyone admit shoving a cigar in a ...well..you know the story...but to answer your question...NO!...but can 100's of ppl keep a secret?...NO!......hell.. 3 can keep a secret..if 2 are dead

 

[Atropine]

Compartmentalization.

Either way, we're beating a dead horse

 

[buffalo-springfield40]

Compartmentalization.

Either way, we're beating a dead horse

agree....but ya gotta beat 'em..only way you can tenderize 'em...MMMmmm,,,BBQ horesy burgers...

 

[IndyBeerman]

In fact, it scares the crap out of me that people would actually think 9/11 was an inside job.

Thank goodness delusional nuts that think this are completely marginalized... as it should be.

This just goes to show that people will believe ANYTHING if they repeat it to themselves enough.

All you have to do is cue up any video of either tower collapse and listen.
If you have ever been around a building implosion you will distinctly hear the charges being set off in sequence. When charges are set off there will be a reverb , you hear no such thing.