Why would it limit bullet choices? Sorry for the noob question, but I have never heard of this before.
If it's classified as pistol ammo then steel core penetrator's would be illegal ie. all that good NATO 855 & ss109 hitting the market since the US switched bullets. Armor piercing hand gun ammo is illegal.
source?
What Disposable Heart said.
6.5 Grendel as a handgun ammo?
Ill take some of whatever the ATF was smoking...
I thought in regards to pistol ammo and AP (in regards to M855) is the content percentage of the steel compared to copper and lead in M855 keeps it from being considered "AP" ammo. I don't think the mere existance of steel counts it as AP. Also, M855 isn't AP, it's "enhanced penetration".
Okay, and a "proprietor" of an obscure ammo company isn't necessarily a solid source. Unless I see an ATF publication on it, this is yet another bunk BS rumor, such as ammo microstamping, bans on lifetime Indiana carry permits and Lady Gaga being a man. (Huge fan of her here!)
Here is the stance:
The definition of AP ammo is at 18 USC sec. 921(a)(17):
"(B) The term 'armor piercing ammunition' means-(i) a projectile or projectile core which may be used in a handgun and which is constructed entirely (excluding the presence of traces of other substances) from one or a combination of tungsten alloys, steel, iron, brass, bronze, beryllium copper, or depleted uranium; or (ii) a full jacketed projectile larger than .22 caliber designed and intended for use in a handgun and whose jacket has a weight of more than 25 percent of the total weight of the projectile.
4) CONSTRUCTION - The bullet must either have a core made ENTIRELY out of one or more of the listed metals, or be a full jacketed type bullet with a jacket comprising more that 25% of its weight. Thus SS109/M855 .223 (5.56mm) bullets would not be covered, because their core is only partly steel, and partly lead. Lead is not a listed metal, and bullets with cores made partly out of lead are OK. ATF has expressly ruled that SS109/M855 bullets are not covered.
5) Hardness of the bullet is irrelevant. 6) Ability to actually penetrate any kind of soft body armor is irrelevant.
Now, that being said, what about Barnes DPX? What about the usage of Barnes Banded Solids (45 grain .224 bullets used for varmint hunting)? DPX is weird to me, as it's solid copper and intended for handguns.
Sorry for the thread divergence, but I stand by my statement on the website listed earlier is bunk, no names, no solid information and no information on the poster...
Just googled it and cant find anything
I just read about this over on ar15. Its a posting on a vendor named elite ammo's web page. Apparently they were making solid brass bullets but calling them copper alloy. They got there hands smacked by the atf and are throwing a hissy. My understanding these aren't new rules. Simply elite trying to skirt the law and got caught.