Good message, overall. But the key point here is missed. Huber shouldn't be honored because Huber acted unlawfully that night, used deadly force without lawful justification against another person, and lost his life because that person lawfully acted in self-defense.
"That the attacker sustained a mortal wound is a matter that should have been considered by the deceased before he committed himself to the task he undertook." - 4DCA, Stinson v State
It isn't "unfortunate" that Huber lost his life that night. Huber forfeited his life through his own actions.
