Both Indiana Senators are on the record for opposing The AWB

[s-works]

According to Piers Morgan 35 senators are on record as opposing the AWB
Donnelly joins Coats (R) and the following Democrat Senators
Baucus (MT)
Begich (AK)
Heitkamp (ND)
King (ME)
Manchin (WV)
Landrieu (LA)
Murray (WA)

28 said they support and 34 said no responses.
3 have no position.

*according to piers morgan

 

[dansgotguns]

Well Donnelly said he doesn't, I think coats said the same but im positive about Donnelly.

 

[s-works]

Interesting that senator Mikulski (r) AK supports the ban when his counterpart opposes

 

[88GT]

The Senate bill is dead. How hard can it be to oppose something that you won't be forced to vote on?

 

[dansgotguns]

The Senate bill is dead. How hard can it be to oppose something that you won't be forced to vote on?

This. I was just correcting the false statement about Donnelly.

 

[s-works]

The Senate bill is dead. How hard can it be to oppose something that you won't be forced to vote on?

A) it is dead because the 7 senators above plus Harry Reid listened to their voters and and opposed it.

B) they are on record if it becomes an amendment.

C) While I disagree with Donnelly on alot of issues I commend him for opposing it (before or after). Something 34 senators have yet to do.

 

[CathyInBlue]

The entire Senate bill went down in flames, or just the AWB amendment to it?

 

[jwh20]

Interesting that senator Mikulski (r) AK supports the ban when his counterpart opposes

Perhaps you mean Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R) from Alaska?

Senator Mikulski is the senior and Democratic senator from Maryland.

 

[Scutter01]

Talk is cheap. I'll wait for their vote. It's easy to oppose a dead bill.

 

[cordex]

Now let's see where they fall on Universal Background Check Backdoor Registration.

 

[Stschil]

Rest assured, Donnelly will vote 'Aye' on UBC and possibly a Mag size restriction.
He has stated publicly that he thinks 'those need to be looked at' .

He has 5 years for Hoosiers to forget and he knows it.

 

[jamil]

Rest assured, Donnelly will vote 'Aye' on UBC and possibly a Mag size restriction.
He has stated publicly that he thinks 'those need to be looked at' .

He has 5 years for Hoosiers to forget and he knows it.

The form letter (the one everyone receives as a response to any corrispondance containing the word "gun") leaves a large hole though which he can slither his way to vote for UBC and mag capacity limits. But 5 years won't erode most gun owner's memories.

 

[j706]

Talk is cheap. I'll wait for their vote. It's easy to oppose a dead bill.

Correct and Coats has said the same before and turned around and voted for the last AWB.

 

[Trigger Time]

A) it is dead because the 7 senators above plus Harry Reid listened to their voters and and opposed it.

B) they are on record if it becomes an amendment.

C) While I disagree with Donnelly on alot of issues I commend him for opposing it (before or after). Something 34 senators have yet to do.

Donnaly said in a written statement that he wasn't apposite at looking at expanded universal background checks and was willing to let it come to the senate for a vote.

He is not our friend on this issue. He will flip flop


Also coats must be watched like a hawk because he will do whatever benefits himself and not us or the constitution.

 

[Stschil]

The form letter (the one everyone receives as a response to any corrispondance containing the word "gun") leaves a large hole though which he can slither his way to vote for UBC and mag capacity limits. But 5 years won't erode most gun owner's memories.

In every letter I write to Donnelly, I remind him that he DID NOT receive the Majority of Hoosier votes and that his allegience is First to represent his Constituents/State and second to his Party. I also remind him that Lugar's seat is his because the People of Indiana were tired of him confusing the two.

 

[kludge]

Now let's see where they fall on Universal Background Check Backdoor Registration.

^this^

STAY ON THEM!

 

[kludge]

In every letter I write to Donnelly, I remind him that he DID NOT receive the Majority of Hoosier votes and that his allegience is First to represent his Constituents/State and second to his Party. /QUOTE]

^disagree^

1. uphold and defend the constitution
2. represent.
3. see #1 and #2

 

[Stschil]

In every letter I write to Donnelly, I remind him that he DID NOT receive the Majority of Hoosier votes and that his allegience is First to represent his Constituents/State and second to his Party. /QUOTE]

^disagree^

1. uphold and defend the constitution
2. represent.
3. see #1 and #2

I said allegiance for a reason.

It is EVERY CITIZENS DUTY to uphold and defend the Constitution.

 

[Notavictim646]

Now let's see where they fall on Universal Background Check Backdoor Registration.

Donnelly's statements seem to indicate he would support stricter background check requirements. Please make sure you contact him and let him know what you think about it. The only way for universal checks could be effectively administrated would be to create a registry That is a non starter for many of us.

 

[cordex]

Donnelly's statements seem to indicate he would support stricter background check requirements. Please make sure you contact him and let him know what you think about it. The only way for universal checks could be effectively administrated would be to create a registry That is a non starter for many of us.

Yep. I've contacted him quite a few times on this particular issue already and encourage others to do likewise.