BP OIL RIG INSIDE JOB

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • WHAT HAPPENED

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 14, 2009
    487
    16
    Largo, FL
    Goldman Sachs sold $250 million of BP stock before spill | Raw Story

    Goldman Sachs sold $250 million of BP stock before spill

    By John Byrne
    Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010 -- 10:12 am
    Stumble This!

    Firm's stock sale nearly twice as large as any other institution; Represented 44 percent of total BP investment

    The brokerage firm that's faced the most scrutiny from regulators in the past year over the shorting of mortgage related securities seems to have had good timing when it came to something else: the stock of British oil giant BP.

    According to regulatory filings, RawStory.com has found that Goldman Sachs sold 4,680,822 shares of BP in the first quarter of 2010. Goldman's sales were the largest of any firm during that time. Goldman would have pocketed slightly more than $266 million if their holdings were sold at the average price of BP's stock during the quarter.

    If Goldman had sold these shares today, their investment would have lost 36 percent its value, or $96 million. The share sales represented 44 percent of Goldman's holdings -- meaning that Goldman's remaining holdings have still lost tens of millions in value.

    The sale and its size itself isn't unusual for a large asset management firm. Wall Street brokerages routinely buy and sell huge blocks of shares for themselves and their clients. In light of a recent SEC lawsuit arguing that Goldman kept information about a product they sold from their clients, however, the stock sale may raise fresh concern among Goldman's critics. Goldman is also a frequent target of liberals and journalists, including Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi, who famously dubbed the firm a "vampire squid."

    Two calls placed to Goldman Sachs' media office in New York Wednesday morning after US markets opened were not immediately returned, though Raw Story decided to publish the story quickly after the calls since the stock sale had been already noted online.

    Others also sold stock
    Other asset management firms also sold huge blocks of BP stock in the first quarter -- but their sales were a fraction of Goldman's. Wachovia, which is owned by Wells Fargo, sold 2,667,419 shares; UBS, the Swiss bank, sold 2,125,566 shares.

    Wachovia and UBS also sold much larger percentages of their BP stock, at 98 percently and 97 percent respectively.

    Wachova parent Wells Fargo, however, bought 2.3 million shares in the quarter, largely discounting Wachovia's sales.

    Those reported buying BP's stock included Wellington Management, a large asset firm, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

    BP is struggling to cap a massive oil leak at one of its drill sites in the Gulf of Mexico. The firm's myriad safety violations over the years have come to light in lieu of the Gulf disaster.

    BP traded on average at $56.86 in the first quarter, according to GuruFocus, a site that monitors the major trading moves of prominent investors. A list of major institutions' sales of BP stock are available at the market research website Morningstar.

    It's certainly unknown as to why the firms sold their holdings. In its analysis of the company in mid-March, Morningstar, the market research site, gave the company an average rating of three out of a possible five stars.

    "BP's valuation carries more uncertainty than ExxonMobil's or Shell's because the firm is less integrated, with more of its earnings coming from the [exploration and production] business than from potentially offsetting refining operations," the site's analyst wrote. "Like its peers, a sustained drop in oil and gas prices can hurt upstream earnings. Lower crude-oil feedstock costs could help refining margins, but refined product pricing lags could quickly swing refining profits to losses. BP's global business faces potential disruptions caused by political risks, particularly with its heavy exposure to Russia. Disruptions caused by environmental and operational constraints could further limit earnings potential."

    The transnational oil company, like other energy giants, was hit with lower oil and gas prices in the past year after the price of oil surged in 2008.

    "BP's fourth quarter marked another quarter of year-over-year production gains, with a 3% increase thanks to new field startups," Morningstar's analyst wrote in another note, after BP turned in better than expected fourth quarter results in February. "BP reported fourth-quarter replacement cost profit of $3.4 billion, up 33% from year-ago earnings of $2.6 billion, as upstream earnings growth was more than enough to offset downstream weakness. For the full year, BP's earnings of $14 billion were 45% below year-ago earnings of $26 billion, in part because of lower oil prices earlier in the year. We're encouraged by BP's sequential earnings gains as new projects and cost-cutting efforts drive upstream results."

    The SEC filed a civil lawsuit against Goldman Sachs and one of its vice presidents in April, asserting that the firm had committed fraud by misrepresenting a mortgage-investment product inherently designed to fail. The company helped a hedge fund trader create a mortgage investment that gained value as mortgage borrowers defaulted en masse.

    In response, Goldman said the SEC's charges were “completely unfounded in law and fact” and averred that it would “vigorously contest them and defend the firm and its reputation.”

    The firm has also faced criticism over giant bonuses paid to staff amidst the US financial crisis. Goldman reduced the sizes of its staff bonuses this year to $16.9 billion, and said it would pay its chief executive $9 million, far less than the previous year.

    Goldman also announced it would create a $500 million program to help small businesses. Critics noted that the figure represented just 3% of the bonus pool.
     

    ocsdor

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 24, 2009
    1,814
    38
    Lafayette, IN
    I think the bigger "coincidence" was the fact the government was going to allow more offshore drilling; and then this happened.

    btw, I don't believe in coincidences.
     

    Fletch

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 19, 2008
    6,379
    48
    Oklahoma

    There are tons of plausible explanations for why they would sell their stock, and none of them require a conspiracy. The simplest explanations are that they had met their investment goals with regard to BP stock, or that BP stock was no longer working in their investment strategy.

    By the same token:
    Or how about the fact that Halliburton bought one of the biggest oil dissaster spill clean up companies just 8 days before the spill.

    Halliburton to Buy Boots & Coots for $232 Million - FOXBusiness.com

    There are plenty of perfectly reasonable explanations as to why Halliburton might want a clean-up company as one of its assets. After all, they're trying to run things in the Persian Gulf, where their physical assets may be targets and cause all sorts of environmental damage over there.

    None of this requires a conspiracy, and we should require much more evidence before believing there is one.
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,074
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Hi, Occam here and I brought my razor.:D

    Doesn't Goldman do trades like this every 10 minutes or so? Aren't they in the business of buying and selling stocks, in enormous blocks?
     
    Rating - 100%
    15   0   0
    Aug 14, 2009
    3,816
    63
    Salem
    Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by stupidity... I have worked for BP as a consultant in the past.... suffice it to say, I'm NOT betting on a Goldman conspiracy. Just sayin'.
     

    BigMatt

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Sep 22, 2009
    1,852
    63
    It's not like you can just get a tip on an oil distaster and buy a $232M company that day. It takes months - maybe years to buy a company like that.

    I will not venture to say that the oil distaster was caused by sabotage, but I will say the slow cleanup efforts look like they may be on purpose.

    Or how about the fact that Halliburton bought one of the biggest oil dissaster spill clean up companies just 8 days before the spill.

    Halliburton to Buy Boots & Coots for $232 Million - FOXBusiness.com
     

    shooter521

    Certified Glock Nut
    Rating - 100%
    17   0   0
    May 13, 2008
    19,185
    48
    Indianapolis, IN US
    Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by stupidity

    That's sig line material, right there. :yesway:

    As to the original post:
    1460652859_80e8c9a70b.jpg
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,070
    113
    Uranus
    George Bush did it.
    He sent Cheney down there with his top secret right wing militia and
    they took it out for Bush because that would shut down drilling in the ocean.
    Thereby making the only source of oil land based.
    Bush has wells "ON LAND" I also heard Palin has a private oil field in
    Alaska, I believe she was in on it too. We have to get the oil somewhere right?



    EDIT:

    I just found out through extensive research on the internet
    that it was BUSH in connection with the Bilderberg group and the Illuminati.
    They met shortly before the "incident" at the Bohemian Grove.
    Coincidence? I think not!
     
    Last edited:

    rambone

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Mar 3, 2009
    18,745
    83
    'Merica
    We call this the "Oiler Movement."


    Here's another large coincidence. The same company who bought into the oil-cleanup business also worked exact same rig, the day before the incident.

    Halliburton: Work on Oil Rig Finished Before Blast - ABC News

    Oil services contractor Halliburton Inc. says it safely finished a cementing operation 20 hours before a Gulf of Mexico rig went up in flames. In testimony prepared for a congressional hearing Tuesday, Halliburton says it completed work on the well according to accepted industry practice and federal regulators.

    Halliburton executive Tim Probert says a pressure test was conducted after the work was finished, and the well owner decided to continue. A copy of the testimony was obtained by The Associated Press.

    The cause of the April 20 explosion is under investigation, but lawsuits filed after the disaster claim it was caused when Halliburton workers improperly capped the well — a process known as cementing. Halliburton denies wrongdoing.


    Another coincidence will be when we pass a stream of anti-energy, anti-economy, anti-oil legislation and give broader power to regulators and to the EPA.

    It is coming. Obama needed a crisis to cure.

    I don't know what to believe. Something stinks, and it ain't the dead dolphins they keep showing on TV.
     

    Kirk Freeman

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 9, 2008
    48,074
    113
    Lafayette, Indiana
    Sure, Haliburton is going to be there. Who else is going to be able to do it?

    One just doesn't ring up "Jasper and Cledus' Concrete, INC." of Pumphandle, Mississippi to go pour concrete a mile under the ocean.
     

    ocsdor

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 24, 2009
    1,814
    38
    Lafayette, IN
    George Bush did it.
    He sent Cheney down there with his top secret right wing militia and
    they took it out for Bush because that would shut down drilling in the ocean.
    Thereby making the only source of oil land based.
    Bush has wells "ON LAND" I also heard Palin has a private oil field in
    Alaska, I believe she was in on it too. We have to get the oil somewhere right?



    EDIT:

    I just found out through extensive research on the internet
    that it was BUSH in connection with the Bilderberg group and the Illuminati.
    They met shortly before the "incident" at the Bohemian Grove.
    Coincidence? I think not!

    I heard once that Hitler killed millions of Jews in just a couple years time. What gullible people believe that crap anyway?
     
    Top Bottom