In a recently published policy report, the "libertarian" CATO Institute does an excellent job detailing reasons that Democrat-driven gun controls fail, but recommends that we do them anyway. CATO is defining compromise as Democrats always do: give them at least some of what they want.
Gun Control: Grounds for Compromise? | Cato Institute
CATO Institute: Pro-semi-auto weapon bans, pro-magazine limits, pro-expanded background checks, anti-Contitution. But you can feel okay about those new restrictions because:
Gun Control: Grounds for Compromise? | Cato Institute
CATO Institute: Pro-semi-auto weapon bans, pro-magazine limits, pro-expanded background checks, anti-Contitution. But you can feel okay about those new restrictions because:
It’s doubtful that new gun controls — imposed mostly on persons who are not part of the problem — will be effective. Accordingly, they should expire automatically after a reasonable test period.