Agreed. Suicide vests are such a difficult thing to eliminate without wands and checkpoints. Even then, somebody is gonna die
Agreed... the check point then becomes the choke point.
Agreed. Suicide vests are such a difficult thing to eliminate without wands and checkpoints. Even then, somebody is gonna die
What he saidin the last post.
Dont use the term security team when talking to the insurance co. Safety team is much better received. An armed security detail would have tripled our insurance costs. Dont mention guns to them they get all squirmy.
So what I am getting from this is even when approached from a well defined plan using trained and properly (standard issue side arms and amo) armed people it then becomes a slippery legal slope and insurance company's run and hide.
What the heck are folks supposed to do.....hire this out. Ridiculous.
Yes. Insured and bonded will always be cheaper than risking insurance companies cutting ties due to breach of contract due to willful omission. Anything that has potential for violence (use all the favorite key words you can think of) will be rated higher by insurance adjuster, actuaries, and everyone else with skin in the game.
So, having seen, experienced and knowing some of the security forces I guess just being SA in your group would be the best way to go.
Even those you may hire are not going to go out on a limb as one may do for the group. Being a member of said group.
Well, yes and NO...
If guns are not mentioned to the insurance Co. then you probably will hear after an incident " GUNS-GUNS, You did NOT say anything about GUNS---Nope, NO coverage here..."....Bill.
As we were told by actually having a written plan, training requirements, and keeping records it would ahow that we knew people would be armed and that would be enough to open the door for insurance to distance themselves in the event that something would happen. Their stance could be that by having armed security it increases the potential of a situation being escalated and a gun being used. We were told the best plan from a legaland insurance stand point is to hire off duty officers who would be covered by their dept to perform security.
As we were told by actually having a written plan, training requirements, and keeping records it would ahow that we knew people would be armed and that would be enough to open the door for insurance to distance themselves in the event that something would happen. Their stance could be that by having armed security it increases the potential of a situation being escalated and a gun being used. We were told the best plan from a legaland insurance stand point is to hire off duty officers who would be covered by their dept to perform security.
I am not a member of our security so I don't know the particulars.
- Our ushers are trained to intercept folks walking around during the service and help them find a seat.
- Our uniformed guards patrol the coridors, proprety and direct traffic. They are armed and some bring their duty vehicles and park around the property.
- Execuitive Protection are in plain clothes, armed and situated in key spots around the auditorium Two on front row and two in balcony that I know of.
- All are linked by police band radios.
- They run their own training and qualification, which I understand is very comprehensive.
- We also have a medical team which consists of qualified EMT's and several nurses.
Serious inquires can be made by calling and making an apointment. I am not sure which pastor over sees security, but I am sure that Eddie Lapina would be helpful in getting you in touch with the propper person. The number is 219 923 0711, FBC Hammond.
We have had this for over thirty years, because we had death threats against our pastors.