Climate-gate saga continues

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • 5.56'aholic

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 5, 2009
    981
    28
    <- tragic boating accident
    And yet people still think that climate change (as in AGW) is real....

    FOXNews.com - Africa-Gate? U.N. Fears of Food Shortages Questioned

    Africa-Gate? U.N. Fears of Food Shortages Questioned
    FOXNews.com
    The U.N.'s controversial climate report is coming under fire -- again -- this time by one of its own scientists, who admits he can't find any evidence to support a warning about a climate-caused North African food shortage.

    The U.N.'s controversial climate report is coming under fire -- again -- this time by one of its own scientists, who admits he can't find any evidence to support a warning about a climate-caused North African food shortage.

    The statement comes from a key 2007 report to the U.N., and asserts that by 2020 yields from rain-fed agriculture could be reduced by up to 50% in some African countries thanks to climate change.

    But this weekend, a key author of the team behind that report told The Sunday Times that he could find no evidence to support his own group's claim. The revelation follows the retraction by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of a claim that the Himalayan glaciers might all melt by 2035, dubbed 'Glaciergate' by commentators.

    The newest controversial claim could become a very important error in the IPCC's reporting, because it comes not only from the IPCC's report on climate change impacts -- called Assessment Report 4, or AR4 -- but is also repeated in its "Synthesis Report." That report is the IPCC's most politically sensitive publication, distilling its most important science into a form accessible to politicians and policy makers.

    Its lead authors include IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri himself, who has quoted it in speeches, as has U.N. secretary-general Ban Ki-moon.

    Speaking at the 2008 global climate talks in Poznan, Poland, Pachauri said: "In some countries of Africa, yields from rain-fed agriculture could be reduced by 50% by 2020." In a speech last July, Ban said: "Yields from rain-fed agriculture could fall by half in some African countries over the next 10 years."

    Speaking this weekend, Professor Chris Field, the new lead author of the IPCC's climate impacts team, said: "I was not an author on the 'Synthesis Report,' but on reading it I cannot find support for the statement about African crop yield declines."

    This sort of claim should be based on hard evidence, said Robert Watson, chief scientist at Defra, the U.K.'s department for environment food and rural affairs, who chaired the IPCC from 1997 to 2002.

    "Any such projection should be based on peer-reviewed literature from computer modelling of how agricultural yields would respond to climate change. I can see no such data supporting the IPCC report," he said.

    For more on this topic, read The Times of London.
     

    IndyBeerman

    Was a real life Beerman.....
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jun 2, 2008
    7,700
    113
    Plainfield
    It has been my long standing theory that a lot, and I do mean a whole LOT of arm twisting and bending has been done to climatologist and scientist, that in order for them to continue to receive funding and grants from government entities, they have to supply manipulated and error filled data to support programs and laws that end up being money draining to the general population in order to fill the coffers.

    Just my :twocents:'s while it's still in my pocket.


    man-displaying-his_%7E15476-54dg.jpg
     
    Last edited:

    SD45

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Feb 9, 2010
    43
    6
    Northern Indiana
    As I just mentioned in another topic....

    I wonder if people are confused on why glacial ice has been receding for the past 10k years (Indiana was covered in it), or why there is over 5,000 feet of ocean sediment (called limestone) that is beneath us here in Indiana. In the past 400 million years there has been over 300 proven periods of ice to tropic back to ice cycles. Of course all those emissions back 30 million years ago accounted for all that....ugh.

    Not that I do not think man made emissions do not have some effect. The total amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is .038%. Of this of this .038% only 7% of this is a result of human activities. So...needless to say....000266% of the atmosphere is effected by humans

    If people just would open their eyes alittle bit...or do a 30 second google search...they would maybe start understanding the truth
     
    Top Bottom