Connecticut has decided NY & California should elect our president

[BluedSteel]

There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud. Technically it's impossible to prove one way or another,

That depends on how you define 'Technically'. And 'evidence'. I used to make a living with statistics [yes I know the quote about the three kinds of lies]. If you accept the laws of large-scale sampling then you can 'technically' or 'statistically' prove fraud. There were multiple districts (or precincts) on the east coast that didn't record a single vote in Trump's favor. That good ole' law of averages [or the bell curve if you prefer] says that this is not possible. So does that remarkably uncommon measuring stick of 'common sense'. In fact the UN has used the absence of any votes for the opposition candidate in African countries as the basis for declaring "electoral irregularities". Then there are those precincts in Detroit (37% of them) that recorded more votes than there are registered voters. Of course we could always blame that on poor math skills from third-world quality schools. Yeah, let's go with that.

 

[MinuteManMike]

The naivete of some Americans is really amusing and sad at the same time. The Repukes signed a consent decrees over 30 years ago that crippled their ability to raise legal challenges in regards to voting.

Look at the high members of the Democratic party.... yeah. Then ask yourself how honest they kept themselves.

 

[Ingomike]

The naivete of some Americans is really amusing and sad at the same time. The Repukes signed a consent decrees over 30 years ago that crippled their ability to raise legal challenges in regards to voting.

Look at the high members of the Democratic party.... yeah. Then ask yourself how honest they kept themselves.

please explain?

M