When I'm helping the fight against "blue" laws, alcohol restrictions, drug prohibition, laws prohibiting gambling, prostitution, and other forms of consensual non-violent conduct, the people I most often see in opposition are "conservatives". When I stand up for the basic human rights of individuals who have fallen afoul of society's good graces, such as ex-convicts and paroled sex offenders, my opposition is again usually "conservatives". The folks generally helping are "liberals". I fail to see then, how libertarians and conservatives can all be lumped in together.
Because those so-called conservatives are anything but. They are not acting out of conservative principles, but moral ones, and while they are entitled to believe whatever they want, if they think that morality is in any way within the purvue of the government, they are not conservatives. To argue in favor of smaller government, while at the same time pushing for any kind of restrictions on behavior is not a logically consistent ideology, just like those on the left who protest in favor of personal freedoms, but believe that government can solve our problems. These two sides are the political choices we have been presented with in the great battle between Republican and Democrat, and it is a false choice, because no matter which side wins, we all lose liberty in the process.
Those free-thinkers on the left need to be shown that greater government control can only lead to less liberty, and the prudes on the right need to learn that tolerating some things which they find distasteful is part of the cost of living in a free society.